NEW! Podcast: Zinedine Zidane, Israeli Crimes Against Humanity, and Ten Films to Better Understand our Reality
Sections on today's Signs Page:
Signs Editorials
Editorial: Dispatch from Gaza: We Suffer Together
Testimony recorded by Silvia Cattori on July 14, 2006
Our friend Swiss journalist Silvia Cattori is in Palestine reporting on the criminal actions of the Israeli army in Gaza. She sent us this report.
The testimony of this Palestinian living in the north of Gaza gives an idea of the way Palestinians are reacting to the events that are hitting them.
Silvia Cattori: What is the mental state of the population after weeks of bombings and deprivations?
A: We have suffered. We are in a dramatic situation. The Israeli army has entered up to Saladine Street; the military has cut Gaza in two: it is like it was before. They have installed a base. There are a dozen tanks with bulldozers. They are in the process of razing land, greenhouses; they are destroying all that remains of life. For two weeks, the F-16s and the drones bomb and destroy our homes. There are hundreds of dead and badly wounded.
S.C.: Is it blind bombing of everything as opposed to bombing that is targeting "terrorists"?
A: The day before yesterday, for example, the Israelis attacked a house, assassinating an entire family, under the pretext that it sheltered Mohamed Daif, the head of those firing the Qassam rockets. However, it wasn't true. Unfortunately, an entire family, a father, a mother, five daughters and two sons lost their lives.
S.C.: Having cut Gaza in two, are the soldiers threatening the population from this position?
A: Yes, their tanks, posted in the centre of the Gaza Strip, between Del Balla and Kahn Younes, are currently firing rockets - just like in the north of Gaza.
S.C.: Are the tanks moving?
A: No, the Israeli soldiers are chicken; they are afraid of being attacked by the resistance.
S.C.: Do the members of the Hamas Government still show themselves on the street?
A: We are seeing no one. They are all on the list of the next assassinations. They only come out when they have a rendez-vous, but it is always done with great secrecy.
S.C.: During the two weeks of the bombings that have left you without water, without electricity, without food, have you been afraid for your family?
A: The first attack by the Israeli planes at Betlaya was near my house. It was there that there were a large number of wounded and killed. The children were in a panic. Fearing that Israel would attack our neighbourhood, we left our house to move away from the zone. Now, we have returned home.
S.C.: How do people put up with living in such a horrible situation? Do they want you to free the captured soldier as quickly as possible to end Israel's pretext to continue the collective punishment?
A: The majority of the Palestinians support the position of the resistance, the position that the soldier won't be released until Israel releases 1000 of the weakest prisoners they hold, women and children. Prisoners that are living - contrary to the Israeli propaganda film shown recently on television in the west that we have heard about - under inhuman conditions. This film didn't talk about the torture of the prisoners, didn't show prisoners being held like beasts in tents, plagued by insects and disease, didn't say that most of the prisoners can only see their families once every six months. [1]
S.C.: Has the accord signed between Fatah and Hamas two weeks ago taken affect?
A: They were speaking of an entente. But on the ground, it is the contrary. The Fatah militia continues their assassinations, so the Palestinians continue to be threatened by two enemies: that is, by Israel and by those Palestinians who are collaborating with the occupier in order to destablize Hamas. The Israeli attacks actually prevented a civil war between Palestinians. At this moment, each Palestinian, no matter what party, feels above all like a target of Israeli shooting.
S.C.: Can even the father of a family like you, who has nothing to do with the resistance, be hit by what they call a targeted assassination?
A: You must know that our crime is being Palestinian, to belong to Palestine. If I find myself by chance in the same taxi as someone that an Israeli plane wants to assassinate, I can be killed.
S.C.: For that you will have to face more and more aggression? The Israeli army has announced that Operation Summer Rain will last as long as necessary.
A: You know that Israel is government by lunatics at this moment. They are narrow-minded politicians. They have unleashed war in Gaza, and, as of two days, they have declared war on Lebanon. Maybe that will give us a bit of a break because the pressure is only longer only concentrated on us.
S.C.: One thing that is worrisome in any situation of war is the trauma undergone by the children. Are they still normal after all they have had to endure?
A: The other day I wanted to take my kids to the sea. My three-year-old daughter started to cry. She said, "No, Daddy, I never want to go to the beach again." I asked her why. "I don't want to die." I said, "OK, if you don't want to die, I'll go with your brothers and sisters." "You neither. No one should go to the beach," she cried. You can see how a three-year-old child reacts after seeing on television the family massacred on the beach. If I talk about the beach, she cries.
S.C.: Were the victims these last months people like you, people who are not armed, who have no protection, and who do not harm anyone?
A: Almost all of the victims are civilians. However, the Israeli army justifies the bombings of families who are eating or sleeping saying that there are fighters among them. There are members of the resistance, but they aren't among these victims. Everyone in Palestine, with the exception of the collaborators, is a resistor in spirit.
S.C.: With such a catastrophic situation, one that is ongoing, in what kind of mental state are you?
A: We continue to live in spite of the unlivable situation Israel imposes upon us. We are accustomed to living this life that isn't a life. There is no food, there is only brackish water, there is no electricity. This is our life. But it is better than living a life were we crush ourselves.
SC.: How will you be able to rebuild yet again the entire infrastructure that the Israel bombing is destroying? Do you think they can be put back in action quickly?
A: The Israelis will never leave standing anything we build. Each time that we repair the transformer in the north or the south of Gaza, they bomb it again. We have yet to hear any protests from the Arab or European states. Some states have condemned the Israeli operations, but their condemnations are too weak. It isn't enough to make Israel back off. From the moment that Europe cut off our aid, it meant they have been collaborating with Israel in its collective punishment, to starve us and to make us suffer more.
S.C.: Do you have the impression that the journalists who obtained permission to enter Gaza have been correctly informing the world on the suffering you are undergoing?
A: It is always the same thing, whether they come or not. I would have been very happy it if had been you who had gotten permission to come, because I am certain you would have reported with honesty. We follow the news. It is always a superficial and Israeli version of things that is shown. The suffering of the people, our pain, all those at CNN, Fox News, the BBS, have no idea what it is. They lie in our faces. We watch their lies live.
S.C.: Don't you think that those journalists that ignore your reality and repeat the same things are led into error by the Palestinian chauffeurs and guides accompanying and supervising them and informing them in a biased way?
A: All they have to do is what you do, go out into the street and get people to talk. It's not by them all staying in the same five star hotels in Gaza that they will be able to find the truth.
S.C.: They don't go out into the streets?
A: Even when they go, they conform to the information given by Israeli press officers or the supervision of their agencies. At the end of the day, they say what their Jerusalem or other office tells them to say and don't say what they have been told not to say. You're a journalist; you should know how it works.
S.C.: I wasn't able to enter Gaza this time and can't report on what is happening to you. It makes me all the more sad because I have remained very attached to the place and I knew so many Palestinians who were suffering and two members of the ISM as well as the London journalist James Miller - who wanted to report about your suffering and the assassination of children - who were killed in 2003 by the Israeli army.
A: They won't let you in because you are too honest. Israel well knows that you do not look at our reality in the same way as the journalists who generally come here. If you were seeing everything through the eyes of Israeli propaganda, you could have entered Gaza....
S.C. I was interrogated by the Israel secret service Sabak on my arrival at Ben Gurion airport. Won't I put any Palestinian I meet into danger if these services, which have their spies on every Palestinian street, are watching me now?
A: You can't put anyone in danger. Every Palestinian is in danger. At any moment, the drone that is flying overhead can strike me. Don't let yourself be intimidated. Do you know why they intimidated you when you arrived and why they follow you? Because those people are afraid of you?
S.C.: Afraid of me? Are you joking?
A: All of these soldiers and spies that make up the most formidable army in the world, in spite of their power, are afraid of anyone who uses his words...to speak the truth. They are afraid of those who speak the truth. They are weak people. We can win this fight even though our means are nothing compared to theirs, because we have the will and the courage that they don't have.
S.C.: What I have seen since I started traveling through the West Bank is without a doubt less atrocious than what is happening in Gaza, but, believe me, it is already too much to support. I cried when I saw a group of people being held like animals in an enclosed space at the checkpoint in Bethlehem. I cried when I arrived in Naplouse and I saw the crowd of silent people who were waiting for the soldiers to condescend to let them leave. You Palestinians seem so strong in the face of all of these humiliations they impose. Do you cry sometimes?
A: Of course I cry. I often cry now when I see all of these families who have been assassinated. A quarter of the victims are children.
S.C.: Does your wife cry, too?
A: Yes, often. Everywhere around, here in Gaza, or over there in the West Bank, are people struck by misfortune that breaks your heart. We are one people and we are suffering together. We are one unique body.
[1] It may be the film recently shown by the television network Arte.
P.S.: This interview was conducted via internet and telephone.
Translated by Signs of the Times
Comment on this Editorial
Editorial: Acts of war, or war crimes?
Eli Stephens
Left I on the News
July 13, 2006
Israel says the seizing of two Israeli soldiers by Hizballah is an "act of war" (on the part of the Lebanese government). I wonder what they consider this to be, then?Police said 52 Lebanese civilians, including 15 children, were killed in attacks on Hezbollah targets in Beirut's southern suburbs and across southern Lebanon.
Security sources said the air strikes in south Lebanon also wounded 100 people. Ten members of a family were killed in Dweir village and seven family members died in Baflay.
Note that Israel has not declared war. Therefore these acts can be nothing other than war crimes. Not that most of the Israeli attacks wouldn't qualify as war crimes even if they had declared war.
Update: Note how this story is being headlined and reported, e.g., in this AP story.
Note that the murder of 50 civilians takes a distinct second place to bombing an airport runway, and note also the language: "More than 50 people have died in violence." Not "been killed by Israeli bombs or missiles." They just died in some sort of unspecified violence. Sure they did.
Second update: Kyra Phillips on CNN just now did a summary of what's going on. I'll paraphrase: "Israel has bombed Beirut airport. Hizballah is firing rockets at Israel, including at Haifa. Israeli ships are blockading Lebanese ports." Not one word about the death of 52 (probably more by now) Lebanese civilians. Not a word. Then, just a couple minutes later, she was grilling the Syrian ambassador, asking him about civilian deaths. Israeli deaths, of course. How could she ask about the death of Lebanese civilians when she doesn't even acknowledge that they occur?
Third update: Every reporter on CNN is describing the reported (not completely confirmed; actually denied by Hizballah) landing of two Hizballah-fired rockets in Haifa as a "dangerous escalation." Can anyone explain how that could possibly be an "escalation" after Israel has bombed Lebanese bridges, Beirut airport runways and Beirut airport fuel storage tanks, is blockading ports, and has killed 52 civilians with missile attacks? None of those things has been described by CNN as a "dangerous escalation," yet when (if) Hizballah fires two rockets at Haifa, that's a "dangerous escalation."
Comment on this Editorial
Editorial: Beirut waits as Syrian masters send Hezbollah allies into battle
By Robert Fisk
The Independent
07/13/06
It's about Syria. That was the frightening message delivered by Damascus yesterday when it allowed its Hizbollah allies to cross the UN Blue Line in southern Lebanon, kill three Israeli soldiers, capture two others and demand the release of Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails.
Within hours, a country that had begun to believe in peace - without a single Syrian soldier left on its soil - found itself once more at war.
Israel held the powerless Lebanese government responsible - as if the sectarian and divided cabinet in Beirut can control Hizbollah. That is Syria's message. Fouad Siniora, Lebanon's affable Prime Minister, may have thought he was running the country but it is President Bashar Assad in Damascus who can still bring life or death to a land that lost 150,000 lives in 15 years of civil conflict.
And there is one certain bet that Syria will rely on; that despite all Israel's threats of inflicting "pain" on Lebanon, this war will run out of control until - as has so often happened in the past - Israel itself calls for a ceasefire and releases prisoners. Then the international big-hitters will arrive and make their way to the real Lebanese capital - Damascus, not Beirut - and appeal for help.
That is probably the plan. But will it work? Israel has threatened Lebanon's newly installed infrastructure and Hizbollah has threatened Israel with further conflict. And therein lies the problem; to get at Hizbollah, Israel must send its soldiers into Lebanon - and then it will lose more soldiers.
Indeed when a single Merkava tank crossed the border into Lebanon yesterday morning, it struck a Hizbollah mine, which killed three more Israelis.
Certainly Hizbollah's attack broke the United Nations rules in southern Lebanon - a "violent breach" of the Blue Line, it was called by Geir Pedersen, the senior UN official in the country - and was bound to unleash the air force, tanks and gunboats of Israel on to this frail, dangerous country. Many Lebanese in Beirut were outraged when gangs of Hizbollah supporters drove through the streets of the capital with party flags to "celebrate" the attack on the border.
Christian members of the Lebanese government were voicing increasing frustration at the Shia Muslim militia's actions - which only proved how powerless the Beirut administration is.
By nightfall, Israel's air raids had begun to spread across the country - the first civilians to die were killed when an aircraft bombed a small road bridge at Qasmiyeh - but would they go even further and include a target in Syria? This would be the gravest escalation so far and would have US as well as UN diplomats appealing for that familiar, tired quality - "restraint".
And prisoner swaps is probably all that will come of this. In January 2004, for example, Israel freed 436 Arab prisoners and released the bodies of 59 Lebanese for burial, in return for an Israeli spy and the bodies of three Israeli soldiers.
As long ago as 1985, three Israeli soldiers captured in 1982 were traded for 1,150 Lebanese and Palestinian prisoners. So Hizbollah knows - and the Israelis know - how this cruel game is played. How many have to die before the swaps begin is a more important question.
What is also clear is that for the first time Israel is facing two Islamist enemies - in southern Lebanon and in Gaza - rather than nationalist guerrillas. The Palestinian Hamas movement's spokesmen in Lebanon yesterday denied that there was any co-ordination with Hizbollah. This may be literally true but Hizbollah timed its attack when Arab feelings are embittered by the international sanctions placed on the democratically elected Hamas government and then the war in Gaza. Hizbollah will ride the anger over Gaza in the hope of escaping condemnation for its capture and killing of Israelis yesterday.
And there is one more little, sinister question. In past violence of this kind, Syria's power was controlled by the Hafez Assad, one of the shrewdest Arabs in modern history. But there are those - including Lebanese politicians - who believe that Bashar, the son, lacks his late father's wisdom and understanding of power. This is a country, remember, whose own Minister of Interior allegedly committed suicide last year and whose soldiers had to leave Lebanon amid suspicion that Syria had set up the murder of Rafik Hariri, Lebanon's former prime minister, last year. All this may now seem academic. But Damascus remains, as always, the key.
[ Original ]
Comment on this Editorial
Editorial: A Wave of Sexual Terrorism In Iraq
By Ruth Rosen
Tomdispatch.com
July 14, 2006
Behind the rape and murder of an Iraqi girl and her family lies a far larger story of what's happened to women in Iraq since they were 'liberated' by the Bush administration.
Abu Ghraib. Haditha. Guantanamo. These are words that shame our country. Now, add to them Mahmudiya, a town 20 miles south of Baghdad. There, this March, a group of five American soldiers allegedly were involved in the rape and murder of Abeer Qassim Hamza, a young Iraqi girl. Her body was then set on fire to cover up their crimes, her father, mother, and sister murdered. The rape of this one girl, if proven true, is probably not simply an isolated incident. But how would we know? In Iraq, rape is a taboo subject. Shamed by the rape, relatives of this girl wouldn't even hold a public funeral and were reluctant to reveal where she is buried.
Like women everywhere, Iraqi women have always been vulnerable to rape. But since the American invasion of their country, the reported incidence of sexual terrorism has accelerated markedly -- and this despite the fact that few Iraqi women are willing to report rapes either to Iraqi officials or to occupation forces, fearing to bring dishonor upon their families. In rural areas, female rape victims may also be vulnerable to "honor killings" in which male relatives murder them in order to restore the family's honor. "For women in Iraq," Amnesty International concluded in a 2005 report, "the stigma frequently attached to the victims instead of the perpetrators of sexual crimes makes reporting such abuses especially daunting."
This specific rape of one Iraqi girl, however, is now becoming symbolic of the way the Bush administration has violated Iraq's honor; Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has already launched an inquest into the crime. In an administration that normally doesn't know the meaning of an apology, the American ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad and the top American commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey Jr. both publicly apologized. In a fierce condemnation, the Muslim Scholars Association in Iraq denounced the crime: "This act, committed by the occupying soldiers, from raping the girl to mutilating her body and killing her family, should make all humanity feel ashamed."
Shame, yes, but that is hardly sufficient. After all, rape is now considered a war crime by the International Criminal Court.
It wasn't always that way. Soldiers have long viewed women as the spoils of war, even when civilian or military leaders condemned such behavior, but in the early 1990s, a new international consensus began to emerge on the act of rape. Prodded by an energized global women's movement, the General Assembly of the United Nations passed a Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in 1993. Subsequent statutes in the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda, as well as the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court in July 2002, all defined rape as a crime against humanity or a war crime.
No one accuses American soldiers of running through the streets of Iraq, raping women as an instrument of war against the insurgents (though such acts are what caused three Bosnian soldiers, for the first time in history, to be indicted in 2001 for the war crime of rape).
Still, the invasion and occupation of Iraq has had the effect of humiliating, endangering, and repressing Iraqi women in ways that have not been widely publicized in the mainstream media: As detainees in prisons run by Americans, they have been sexually abused and raped; as civilians, they have been kidnapped, raped, and then sometimes sold for prostitution; and as women -- and, in particular, as among the more liberated women in the Arab world -- they have increasingly disappeared from public life, many becoming shut-ins in their own homes.
Rape and sexual humiliation in prisons
The scandal of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib focused on the torture, sexual abuse, and humiliation of Iraqi men. A variety of sources suggest that female prisoners suffered similar treatment, including rape.
Few Americans probably realize that the American-run prison at Abu Ghraib also held female detainees. Some of them were arrested by Americans for political reasons -- because they were relatives of Baathist leaders or because the occupying forces thought they could use them as bargaining chips to force male relatives to inform on insurgents or give themselves up.
According to a Human Rights Watch report, the secrecy surrounding female detentions "resulted from a collusion of the families and the occupying forces." Families feared social stigma; the occupying forces feared condemnation by human rights groups and anger from Iraqis who saw such treatment of women by foreigners as a special act of violation.
On the condition of anonymity and in great fear, some female detainees nevertheless did speak with human rights workers after being released from detention. They have described beatings, torture, and isolation. Like their male counterparts, they reserve their greatest bitterness for sexual humiliations suffered in American custody. Nearly all female detainees reported being threatened with rape. Some women were interrogated naked and subjected to derision and humiliating remarks by soldiers.
The British Guardian reported that one female prisoner managed to smuggle a note out of Abu Ghraib. She claimed that American guards were raping the few female detainees held in the prison and that some of them were now pregnant. In desperation, she urged the Iraqi resistance to bomb the jail in order to spare the women further shame.
Amal Kadham Swadi, one of seven Iraqi female attorneys attempting to represent imprisoned women, told the Guardian that only one woman she met with was willing to speak about rape. "She was crying. She told us she had been raped. Several American soldiers had raped her. She had tried to fight them off, and they had hurt her arm. She showed us the stitches. She told us, 'We have daughters and husbands. For God's sake don't tell anyone about this.'"
Professor Huda Shaker, a political scientist at Baghdad University, also told the Guardian that women in Abu Ghraib have been sexually abused and raped. She identified one woman, in particular, who was raped by an American military policeman, became pregnant, and later disappeared.
Professor Shaker added, "A female colleague of mine was arrested and taken there. When I asked her after she was released what happened at Abu Ghraib, she started crying. Ladies here are afraid and shy of talking about such subjects. They say everything is OK. Even in a very advanced society in the west it is very difficult to talk about rape."
Shaker, herself, encountered a milder form of sexual abuse at the hands of one American soldier. At a checkpoint, she said, an American soldier "pointed the laser sight [of his gun] directly in the middle of my chest... Then he pointed to his penis. He told me, 'Come here, bitch, I'm going to fuck you.'"
Writing from Baghdad, Luke Hardin of the Guardian reported that at Abu Ghraib journalists have been forbidden from talking to female detainees, who are cloistered in tiny windowless cells. Senior US military officers who have escorted journalists around Abu Ghraib, however, have admitted that rapes of women took place in the cellblock where 19 "high-value" male detainees were also being held. Asked how such abuse could have happened, Colonel Dave Quantock, now in charge of the prison's detention facilities, responded, "I don't know. It's all about leadership. Apparently it wasn't there."
No one should be surprised that women detainees, like male ones, were subjected to sexual abuse at Abu Ghraib. Think of the photographs we've already seen from that prison. If acts of ritual humiliation could be used to "soften up" men, then the rape of female detainees is hardly unimaginable.
But how can we be sure? In January, 2004, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the senior U.S. military official in Iraq, ordered Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba to investigate persistent allegations of human rights abuses at Abu Ghraib. The Taguba Report confirmed that in at least one instance a U.S. military policeman had raped at least one female prisoner and that guards had videotaped and photographed naked female detainees. Seymour Hersh also reported in a 2004 issue of the New Yorker magazine that these secret photos and videos, most of which still remain under wraps by the Pentagon, show American soldiers "having sex with a female Iraqi prisoner." Additional photos have made their way to the web sites of Afterdowningstreet.org and Salon.com. In one photograph, a woman is raising her shirt, baring her breasts, presumably as she was ordered to do.
The full range of pictures and videotapes are likely to show a great deal more. Members of Congress who viewed all the pictures and videotapes from Abu Ghraib seemed genuinely shaken and sickened by what they saw. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn called them "appalling;" then-Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle described them as "horrific." Ever since the scandal broke in April 2004, human rights and civil liberties groups have been engaged in a legal battle with the Department of Defense, demanding that it release the rest of the visual documents. Only when all those documents are available to the general public will we have a clearer ¬and undoubtedly more ghastly ¬record of the sexual acts forced upon both female and male detainees.
Sexual Terrorism on the Streets
Meanwhile, the chaos of the war has also led to a rash of kidnappings and rapes of women outside of prison walls. After interviewing rape and abduction victims, as well as eyewitnesses, Iraqi police and health professionals, and U.S. military police and civil affairs officers, Human Rights Watch released a report in July, 2003, titled Climate of Fear: Sexual Violence and Abduction of Women and Girls in Baghdad. Only months after Baghdad fell to U.S. forces, they had already learned of twenty-five credible allegations of the rape and/or abduction of Iraqi women. Not surprisingly, the report found that "police officers gave low priority to allegations of sexual violence and abduction, that the police were under-resourced, and that victims of sexual violence confronted indifference and sexism from Iraqi law enforcement personnel." Since then, as chaos, violence, and bloodletting have descended on Iraq, matters have only gotten worse.
After the American invasion, local gangs began roaming Baghdad, snatching girls and women from the street. Interviews with human rights investigators have produced some horrifying stories. Typical was nine-year-old "Saba A." who was abducted from the stairs of the building where she lives, taken to an abandoned building nearby, and raped. A family friend who saw Saba A. immediately following the rape told Human Rights Watch:
"She was sitting on the stairs, here, at 4:00 p.m. It seems to me that probably he hit her on the back of the head with a gun and then took her to [a neighboring] building. She came back fifteen minutes later, bleeding [from the vaginal area]. [She was still bleeding two days later, so] we took her to the hospital."
The medical report by the U.S. military doctor who treated Saba A. "documented bruising in the vaginal area, a posterior vaginal tear, and a broken hymen.'
In 2005, Amnesty International also interviewed abducted women. The story of "Asma," a young engineer, was representative. She was shopping with her mother, sister, and a male relative when six armed men forced her into a car and drove her to a farmhouse outside the city. They repeatedly raped her. A day later, the men drove her to her neighborhood and pushed her out of the car.
As recently as June 2006, Mayada Zhaair, spokeswoman for the Women's Rights Association, a local NGO, reported, "We've observed an increase in the number of women being sexually abused and raped in the past four months, especially in the capital."
No one knows how many abducted women have never returned. As one Iraqi police inspector testified, "Some gangs specialize in kidnapping girls, they sell them to Gulf countries. This happened before the war too, but now it is worse, they can get in and out without passports." Others interviewed by Human Rights Watch argued that such trafficking in women had not occurred before the invasion.
The U.S. State Department's June 2005 report on the trafficking of women suggested that the extent of the problem in Iraq is "difficult to appropriately gauge" under current chaotic circumstances, but cited an unknown number of Iraqi women and girls being sent to Yemen, Syria, Jordan, and Persian Gulf countries for sexual exploitation.
In May 2006, Brian Bennett wrote in Time Magazine that a visit to "the Khadamiyah Women's Prison in the northern part of Baghdad immediately produces several tales of abduction and abandonment. A stunning 18-year-old nicknamed Amna, her black hair pulled back in a ponytail, says she was taken from an orphanage by an armed gang just after the US invasion and sent to brothels in Samarra, al-Qaim on the border with Syria, and Mosul in the north before she was taken back to Baghdad, drugged with pills, dressed in a suicide belt and sent to bomb a cleric's office in Khadamiyah, where she turned herself in to the police. A judge gave her a seven-year jail sentence 'for her sake' to protect her from the gang, according to the prison director."
"Families and courts," Bennett reported, "are usually so shamed by the disappearance [and presumed rape] of a daughter that they do not report these kidnappings. And the resulting stigma of compromised chastity is such that even if the girl should resurface, she may never be taken back by her relations."
Disappearing women
To avoid such dangers, countless Iraqi women have become shut-ins in their own homes. Historian Marjorie Lasky has described this situation in "Iraqi Women Under Siege," a 2006 report for Codepink, an anti-war women's organization. Before the war, she points out, many educated Iraqi women participated fully in the work force and in public life. Now, many of them rarely go out. They fear kidnap and rape; they are terrified of getting caught in the cross-fire between Americans and insurgents; they are frightened by sectarian reprisals; and they are scared of Islamic militants who intimidate or beat them if they are not "properly covered."
"In the British-occupied south," Terri Judd reported in the British Independent,"where Muqtada al-Sadr's Mehdi's Army retains a stranglehold, women insist the situation is at its worst. Here they are forced to live behind closed doors only to emerge, concealed behind scarves, hidden behind husbands and fathers. Even wearing a pair of trousers is considered an act of defiance, punishable by death."
Invisible women -- for some Iraqi fundamentalist Islamic leaders, this is a dream come true. The Ministry of the Interior, for example, recently issued notices warning women not to go out on their own. "This is a Muslim country and any attack on a woman's modesty is also an attack on our religious beliefs," said Salah Ali, a senior ministry official. Religious leaders in both Sunni and Shiite mosques have used their sermons to persuade their largely male congregations to keep working women at home. "These incidents of abuse just prove what we have been saying for so long," said Sheikh Salah Muzidin, an imam at a mosque in Baghdad. "That it is the Islamic duty of women to stay in their homes, looking after their children and husbands rather than searching for work---especially with the current lack of security in the country."
In the early 1970s, American feminists redefined rape and argued that it was an act driven not by sexual lust, but by a desire to exercise power over another person. Rape, they argued, was an act of terrorism that kept all women from claiming their right to public space. That is precisely what has happened to Iraqi women since the American invasion of Iraq. Sexual terrorism coupled with religious zealotry has stolen their right to claim their place in public life.
This, then, is a hidden part of the unnecessary suffering loosed by the reckless invasion of Iraq. Amid the daily explosions and gunfire that make the papers is a wave of sexual terrorism, whose exact dimensions we have no way of knowing, and that no one here notices, unleashed by the Bush administration in the name of exporting "democracy" and fighting "the war on terror."
Ruth Rosen is a historian and journalist who teaches public policy at UC Berkeley. She is a senior fellow at the Longview Institute.
[ Original ]
Comment on this Editorial
Zionists Gone Wild
IDF bombs Hizbullah stronghold in Beirut
Hanan Greenberg
Ynet News
July 14, 2006

Wreckage in Beirut, Friday morning (Photo: Reuters)
Night attack in Beirut: Israeli planes struck a bridge in the southern suburb of Beirut, a Hizbullah stronghold, and the fuel stores of the Jiyyeh power plant south of the city early Friday, witnesses and security sources said.
Three people were killed and 55 wounded in the pre-dawn raids on the Shiite Muslim suburb, the Beirut police said. Shops and buildings were damaged and dozens of cars wrecked in the district, home to hundreds of thousands of people.
Eyewitnesses and security sources reported that Israeli aircrafts fired at least seven missiles at the neighborhood. The Lebanese Army responded with anti-aircraft fire. Residents heard at least three strikes. Lebanese security sources also reported that Israeli planes struck the main highway leading to Beirut's international airport and south Lebanon.
Other news reports said a playground where Hizbullah leaders hold rallies for thousands of their supporters was also targeted.
Israel Defense Forces officials confirmed that the army had struck targets in Beirut.
On Friday morning, the Lebanon police reported that IAF aircrafts attacked a base of Ahmed Jibril's organization, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command, at the Bekaa Valley, only 2 kilometers (1.24 miles) away from the Syrian border.
Earlier, Israeli planes struck the main highway linking Beirut to the Syrian capital Damascus, a Lebanese security source said.
The jets struck at least five separate times along different points of the international route, the source said.
Witnesses said the road was clear of traffic after earlier congestion as tourists fled Lebanon to neighboring Syria.
IDF officials said Friday morning that "targets at the Hizbullah organization's main headquarter in Beirut were struck from the air. The IDF attacked the security building and the guard at the organization's main headquarters. In addition, the IDF attacked the bridges and access routes to the area."
According to the army, "the center attacked releases orders and instructions and conducts terror activities."
Israeli officials said on Thursday that Israeli forces planned to strike the key highway as part of an assault aimed at retrieving two soldiers seized by Lebanese Hizbullah guerrillas.
Israel had already bombed Lebanon's airports and blockaded the country from the sea, bringing trade and tourism to a halt.
Lebanese officials said Israeli aircraft dispersed thousands of leaflets above the Shiite-dominated areas of southern Beirut warning citizens to stay clear of Hizbullah offices and operatives.
"For your own safety and because of our desire not to harm any civilians who are not involved (with Hizbullah), you should refrain from staying in areas where Hizbullah is present and operating," said the Arabic-language leaflets, signed "The State of Israel".
'We have no intention of seeking revenge'
Eyewitnesses said hundreds of residents were seen leaving the capital.
IDF sources said several senior Hizbullah members have gone into hiding.
"We assume Hizbullah will continue to launch attacks, also on Haifa, but at the end of the day the organization will be defeated," one official said.
Beirut's Dahiya neighborhood, a Hizbullah stronghold, has been marked as the IDF's key target for the next 24 hours.
The organization maintains several weapons cashes and its headquarters in the neighborhood.
"We have no intention of seeking revenge, but to simply strike what is dearest and most important to Hizbullah," a military source said.
The security establishment decided to intensify the attacks in Lebanon after a 122 millimeter missile was fired at Haifa.
"This is a simple upgraded Katyusha," an army source said. "Hizbullah has more of these Katyushas, and it may launch them."
'We must remain patient'
The IDF rejected Hizbullah's claims that it was not behind the missile attack, saying it had proof the organization did in fact launch the missile toward Haifa. A similar Katyusha was fired just hours earlier at Carmiel.
Lebanon has asked for an immediate ceasefire, but a senior Northern Command officer said "we do not intend to respond positively until the operation's objectives have been attained. The resident of the north understand this and are willing to accept the disruption of their daily lives, including the cancellation of summer camps.
"We must remain patient; the operation began only 24 hours ago," he said.
IDF sources said that after Hizbullah stated that "If Beirut or its suburbs will sustain Israeli attacks, we will attack Haifa," it will not show restraint in its actions against the organization.
"We hold Lebanon, which allows Hizbullah to operate from its capital, responsible for the attacks on the north," an IDF official said.
Comment on this Article
Israel Intensifies Attacks Against Lebanon, Claims Hezbollah is Moving Two Captive Israelis to Iran
By SAM F. GHATTAS
Associated Press
July 13, 2006
BEIRUT, Lebanon - AP Video Israel unleashed a furious military campaign on Lebanon's main airport, highways, military bases and other targets Thursday, retaliating for scores of Hezbollah guerrilla rockets that rained down on Israel and reached as far as Haifa, its third-largest city, for the first time.
The death toll in two days of fighting rose to 57 people, including 10 Israelis, with the sudden burst of violence sending shock waves through a region already traumatized by Iraq and the ongoing battles in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Hamas. It shattered the relative calm in Lebanon that followed Israel's pullout from its occupied zone in south Lebanon in 2000 and the withdrawal of Syrian forces last year.
Israel's target was Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant Shiite faction which has a free hand in southern Lebanon and also holds seats in parliament. Hezbollah sparked the current conflict Wednesday with a cross-border raid that captured two of Israel's soldiers.
Israel said it was determined to beat Hezbollah back and deny the militant fighters positions they have held along the border since 2000.
The Lebanese government, caught in the middle, pleaded for a cease-fire.
"If the government of Lebanon fails to deploy its forces, as is expected of a sovereign government, we shall not allow Hezbollah forces to remain any further on the borders of the state of Israel," Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz said.
Israeli analysts warned that Syria, which supports Hezbollah and plays host to Hamas' political leader Khaled Mashaal, could be Israel's next target.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said any Israeli attack against Syria would be an aggression on the whole Islamic world and warned of a harsh reaction, the official Iranian news agency reported Friday.
Israel's offensive was among its heaviest in Lebanon since it invaded the neighboring country and occupied its capital 24 years ago. Two days of Israeli bombings killed 45 Lebanese and two Kuwaitis and wounded 103. Two Israeli civilians and eight Israeli soldiers have also been killed, the military's highest death toll in four years.
With Beirut's international airport closed after Israeli bombs ripped apart its runway, many tourists were trapped while others drove over the mountains to Syria - though Israeli warplanes struck the highway linking Beirut to the Syrian capital of Damascus early Friday, closing the country's main artery and further isolating Lebanon from the outside world.
Beirut residents stayed indoors, leaving the streets of the capital largely empty. Others packed supermarkets to stock up on goods. Long lines formed on gas stations, with many quickly running out of gas.
Israel said its attacks were to prevent the movement of the captured soldiers and hamper Hezbollah's military capacity. It said it had information Hezbollah was trying to take the two soldiers to its ally, Iran - an allegation denied by the Iranian Foreign Ministry.
Fears mounted among Arab and European governments that violence in Lebanon could spiral out of control in a volatile region already torn by conflicts in Iraq and in Gaza. Israel launched an offensive in Gaza against Hamas, whose fighters are holding another Israeli soldier captured two weeks ago.
The shockwaves from the fighting on two fronts began to be felt as oil prices surged Thursday to a record above $78 a barrel in world markets, also agitated by the threat of supply disruptions in the Middle East and beyond.
At the United Nations, the United States blocked an Arab-backed resolution that would have demanded Israel halt its military offensive in the Gaza Strip, the first U.N. Security Council veto in nearly two years.
President Bush, speaking of the Lebanon offensive, backed Israel's right to defend itself and denounced Hezbollah as "a group of terrorists who want to stop the advance of peace."
But he also expressed worries the Israeli assault could cause the fall of Lebanon's anti-Syrian government. "We're concerned about the fragile democracy in Lebanon," Bush said in Germany.
The European Union took a harsher tone, criticizing Israel for using what it called "disproportionate" force. EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana said he was planning a peace mission.
The Arab League called an emergency meeting of foreign ministers in Cairo on Saturday, and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas warned that Israel's Lebanon offensive "is raising our fears of a new regional war."
Egypt launched a diplomatic bid to resolve the crisis, amid apparent frustration among moderate Arab nations that Hezbollah - and by implication its top ally Syria - had started the fight with Israel.
Saudi Arabia, the Arab world's political heavyweight and economic powerhouse, accused Hezbollah guerrillas - without naming them - of "uncalculated adventures" that precipitated the latest Middle East crisis.
"The kingdom sees that it is time for those elements to alone shoulder the full responsibility for this irresponsible behavior and that the burden of ending the crisis falls on them alone," according to a Saudi official quoted by the Saudi Press Agency.
Hezbollah's rocket attack on the port city of Haifa was its deepest such strike into northern Israel yet. No injuries were reported in Haifa, home to 270,000 residents and a major oil refinery 30 miles south of the border. Still, the Israeli ambassador to the United States, Daniel Ayalon, called the attack "a major, major escalation."
"Those who fire into such a densely populated area will pay a heavy price," said David Baker, an official in the Israeli prime minister's office.
Hezbollah's deputy leader denied its fighters fired on Haifa, but Israel blamed the group, which had warned earlier in the day it would strike the city if Beirut were targeted. Israeli officials said it was a Katyusha rocket launched from southern Lebanon. Witnesses also confirmed that a rocket hit the city.
The militants also fired rockets at four other northern Israeli towns, killing a 40-year-old woman on her balcony in Nahariya and a man in Safad.
Soon the Haifa attack, Israeli helicopter gunships raked fuel depots at Beirut's seaside airport with machine guns and missiles. The tanks exploded, sending gigantic flames into the night sky just outside Beirut. Earlier in the day, warplanes shut down the airport with strikes that pounded craters into all three of its runways, and Israeli warships sealed Lebanon's ports.
By evening, strikes in Hezbollah's stronghold in Beirut's southern neighborhoods appeared imminent. After nightfall Israeli planes dropped leaflets in south Beirut warning residents to avoid areas where Hezbollah operates.
Among the Lebanese dead were a family of 10 and another family of seven, killed when strikes hit their homes in the southern village of Dweir.
"It's a massacre," said Abu Talal, a 48-year-old resident who joined scores of Hezbollah supporters and townspeople at the funeral of Shiite cleric Sheik Adel Akkash, who was killed along with his wife and eight children, ages 3 months to 15 years.
"This is the (Israeli) arrogance. The raids aim to terrorize us, but morale is high."
The last time Israeli strikes targeted Beirut was in 2000, when warplanes hit a power station in the hills above the city after a Hezbollah attack killed Israeli soldiers. Israel has not hit Beirut's airport since its 1982 invasion of Lebanon and occupation of the capital.
Israel says it holds Lebanon responsible for Hezbollah's snatching of the two soldiers, Ehud Goldwasser, 31 and Eldad Regev, 26. The Lebanese government insisted it had no prior knowledge of the move and did not condone it - and even withdrew its ambassador to the U.S. after he made comments seemingly in support of the guerrillas.
Hezbollah fighters operate with almost total autonomy in southern Lebanon, and the government has no control over their actions. But the government has long resisted international pressure to disarm the group. Any attempt to disarm Hezbollah by force could lead to sectarian conflict.
Comment on this Article
Israel orders more strikes
By Lin Noueihed
Reuters
Jul 14, 2006
BEIRUT - Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert ordered more intense strikes on Lebanon on Friday, ratcheting up retaliation against Hizbollah guerrillas following the capture of two Israeli soldiers in a cross-border raid.
The move came at a late-night meeting of security chiefs and followed Israel's blockading of Lebanese ports, the bombing of Beirut airport and strikes against two military airbases.
"The decision was made to intensify Israel's operations in Lebanon," Army Radio quoted political sources as saying after Olmert met with Israeli security chiefs.
Israeli airstrikes and shelling have already killed at least 55 Lebanese civilians since the two soldiers were captured on Wednesday, while a steady barrage of Hizbollah rocket fire into northern Israel has killed two Israeli civilians and wounded 90.
Israeli aircraft struck the main highway linking Beirut with the Syrian capital, Damascus, early on Friday, a Lebanese security source said. It was not immediately clear if there were casualties.
Two Hizbollah missiles hit the Israeli port of Haifa, the country's third largest city, in a move Israel described as a "major escalation" since Haifa, home to around 250,000 people, lies more than 30 km (18 miles) from the Lebanese border.
No one was injured in the Haifa attacks. Hizbollah denied firing on Haifa. In total, Israel said Hizbollah, backed by Iran and Syria, fired more than 100 rockets at towns and villages in the north on Thursday, causing widespread panic and injuries.
The military offensive coincided with an major Israeli offensive into the Gaza Strip to retrieve a captured soldier and halt Palestinian rocket fire.
Israeli troops fired a tank shell at a vehicle in Gaza on Friday, killing a Palestinian and wounding another, Palestinian medics said.
The threat of a larger-scale Israeli ground offensive into Lebanon to prevent the rocket fire gained currency after the Haifa strikes although the military remained tight-lipped.
"All options are available," army spokesman Captain Jacob Dallal said when asked about the possibility of an offensive. "Strategically speaking, if the third largest city in Israel is under attack, it's a big thing and a response can be expected."
In Tehran, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad warned Israel not to attack Syria, saying such action would be considered an assault on the whole Islamic world that would bring a "fierce response," state television reported.
RESTRAINT
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, speaking in Germany, urged Israel to exercise restraint but also demanded that Syria put pressure on Hizbollah to stop attacks on Israel.
But Israel's ambassador to the United States Daniel Ayalon told CNN Israel believed its offensive was now the right way to deal with Hizbollah.
The violence was the fiercest since 1996, when Israeli troops still occupied part of south Lebanon.
President Bush voiced concern about the fate of Lebanon's anti-Syrian government, but offered no direct criticism of the punishment Israel meted out.
"Israel has the right to defend herself," he said while on a visit to Germany.
The European Union and Russia criticized Israel's strikes in Lebanon as a dangerous escalation of the Middle East conflict.
Saudi Arabia, though, blamed "elements" inside Lebanon for the violence with Israel, in unusually frank language directed at Hizbollah and its Iranian backers.
AIR AND SEA BLOCKADE
Lebanese Information Minister Ghazi al-Aridi said that Lebanon wanted an end to "this open-ended aggression" by Israel.
In New York, the U.N. Security Council set an urgent meeting for Friday at Lebanon's request.
The United States on Thursday vetoed a council resolution put forward by Qatar on behalf of Arab states that called on Israel to immediately end its military incursion in Gaza.
The bombing of Beirut's international airport forced flights to divert to Cyprus. Later, Israeli aircraft targeted fuel tanks at the airport, setting at least one tank ablaze.
Planes dropped leaflets in a Beirut suburb, urging residents to stay away from Hizbollah offices, witnesses said, a move that raised the possibility that Hizbollah's leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, could be targeted.
Israeli naval vessels enforcing the siege turned away three ships carrying fuel to Beirut, a shipping source said.
Israel has rejected Hizbollah demands that it release Arab prisoners in exchange for the captive soldiers, named by the Israeli army as Ehud Goldwasser, 31, and Eldad Regev, 26, but says it fears the soldiers could be spirited to Iran.
Iran said Israel was "talking absurdities."
Comment on this Article
Israel widens Lebanon assault
By Alistair Lyon
Reuters
July 14, 2006
BEIRUT - Israel battered roads, mobile phone antennas and fuel tanks in Lebanon on Friday, further devastating its neighbor's economy after Hizbollah guerrillas captured two Israeli soldiers and killed eight.
Hizbollah, which wants to trade its captives for prisoners held in Israel, has showered rockets across the frontier in its fiercest bombardment since Israeli troops left Lebanon in 2000.
Israeli warplanes blasted the main Beirut-Damascus highway overnight, tightening an air, sea and land blockade of Lebanon, and bombed targets in Beirut's teeming Shi'ite Muslim suburbs, killing three people and wounding 40, security sources said.
Their deaths brought to 60 the number of people, almost all civilians, killed in Lebanon since Israel's campaign began.
The Israeli military said Hizbollah had fired more than 130 missiles into Israel in 48 hours, killing two civilians and wounding over 100. It said Hizbollah's main security compound in southern Beirut had been among targets hit on Friday. Reuters reporters said they could see no sign of damage at the site.
Black smoke billowed from a burning fuel depot at the Jiyyeh power plant south of Beirut and from fuel tanks bombed at the capital's international airport on Thursday evening.
Israeli naval vessels sporadically shelled the coastal road near Jiyyeh, witnesses said. Air raids struck several mobile telephone relay stations in eastern Lebanon.
Israeli jets also struck a Palestinian guerrilla base in eastern Lebanon. The pro-Syrian Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command said there were no casualties.
LEBANESE GOVERNMENT POWERLESS
Israel holds Lebanon responsible for the actions of Hizbollah, a Syrian- and Iranian-backed Islamist group which has members in parliament and in the mainly anti-Syrian cabinet.
The fragile Beirut government, too divided to disarm the Shi'ite faction that effectively controls south Lebanon, has urged the U.N. Security Council to call on Israel to halt its onslaught when the top world body meets later on Friday.
But Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his security chiefs opted on Thursday evening to ramp up the punishment. "The decision was made to intensify Israel's operations in Lebanon," Israeli Army Radio quoted political sources as saying.
That followed two unprecedented missile strikes on the port of Haifa, blamed by Israel on Hizbollah, which denied it had fired on the city, 30 km (18 miles) from the Lebanese border.
No one was hurt in the attack.
The violence in Lebanon coincided with an Israeli incursion into the Gaza Strip launched last month to try to retrieve another captured soldier and halt Palestinian rocket fire.
The army said on Friday it had pulled out of the central Gaza Strip, which it entered as part of the offensive. It said its forces had targeted an office of the ruling Hamas militant group in the northern Gaza Strip and a bridge overnight.
Troops fired a tank shell at a vehicle, killing one Palestinian and wounding another, Palestinian medics said.
Fearing a prolonged Israeli-Hizbollah confrontation, Lebanese queued for petrol and hoarded food and drink. Power rationing began and many shops and offices stayed shut.
The crisis has helped drive world oil prices to record highs and has shaken financial markets in Israel and Lebanon.
WARNING LEAFLETS
Israeli planes dropped leaflets in Beirut suburbs and some southern cities urging residents to stay away from Hizbollah offices, witnesses said, fuelling speculation that the group's charismatic leader, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, could be targeted.
"Nasrallah, I think, has pronounced sentence on himself but we will settle the account with him fully somewhere, sometime," Israeli Interior Minister Ronnie Bar-On told Israel Radio.
President Bush has said Israel has the right to defend itself, but should not weaken the Lebanese government. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged Israel to exercise restraint and demanded that Syria rein in Hizbollah.
Syria's ambassador to the United States said Washington should restrain Israel and push for renewed peace talks.
The European Union and Russia have criticized Israel's strikes in Lebanon as disproportionate.
Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon, when asked about the scale of the attacks on Lebanon, said his country was acting just as Russia did against the Chechens and the United States did against al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.
Comment: "Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon, when asked about the scale of the attacks on Lebanon, said his country was acting just as Russia did against the Chechens and the United States did against al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan."
Gosh, we never saw that one coming...
Comment on this Article
Israel appears to 'wish to destroy' Lebanon: Chirac
AFP
July 14, 2006
PARIS - French President Jacques Chirac has said that there appears to be a "wish to destroy Lebanon" in reference to
Israel's bombardments following the abduction of two soldiers.
"One may well ask if there isn't today a kind of wish to destroy Lebanon -- its infrastructure, its roads, its communications, its energy, its airport. And for what?
"I find honestly -- as all Europeans do -- that the current reactions are totally disproportionate," he said in a live television interview to mark France's July 14 national day.
"In the Middle East we are currently in a situation of great fragility and instability. We are in a dangerous situation, a very dangerous situation. We must be very, very careful," he said Friday.
The president welcomed the dispatch of a UN mission to the Middle East, whose aim he said should be to secure the release of the Israeli prisoners -- including one held in Gaza -- establish a ceasefire and study new security arrangements along the Israeli-Lebanese border.
At the same time, he said that Lebanon's Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas movement "need to stop something which is totally inadmissible, unacceptable, irresponsible -- the rocket attacks which are now regular on Israel."
"There is a kind of process engaged in by Hamas and Hezbollah based on provocation-repression .... These people are totally irresponsible," he said.
Asked if the organisations were being encouraged by
Syria and Iran, he said: "I have the feeling ... that Hamas and Hezbollah cannot have taken these initiatives on their own, and that consequently there must be somewhere support from this or that nation."
Comment: "I have the feeling ... that Hamas and Hezbollah cannot have taken these initiatives on their own, and that consequently there must be somewhere support from this or that nation."
Yes indeedy. Given Mossad's history of false flag operations, somehow we doubt that "this or that nation" is really Syria or Iran.
Comment on this Article
Israeli army says it pulls out of central Gaza
Reuters
July 14, 2006
GAZA - The Israeli army pulled out on Friday from the central Gaza Strip, which it entered as part of an offensive launched last month to free an abducted soldier, the army said.
"IDF forces (Israeli Defense Forces) have currently completed their activities in the area," the army said in a statement.
Comment: Um, so where's the soldier??
Comment on this Article
Israel continues air assault on Gaza
by Adel Zaanoun
AFP
July 14, 2006
GAZA CITY - Israel has pressed on with its air assault on Gaza in a bid to retrieve a soldier abducted nearly three weeks ago and stop rocket attacks but troops withdrew from the centre of the territory.
The continued offensive came as the United States vetoed a UN resolution calling on Israel to halt its military operations in Gaza, as the Security Council prepared for an emergency debate on escalating violence in Lebanon.
The air force carried out at least two overnight raids, while ground artillery and naval gunboats pounded the north and south of the Palestinian territory as part of its campaign to secure the release of Corporal Gilad Shalit.
One raid struck the house of an MP for the governing Palestinian movement Hamas, whose administration has been directly targeted in the offensive, in Beit Lahiya in north Gaza, and a bridge in the central part of the territory.
At least 76 Palestinians and one Israeli soldier have now been killed since Israel stepped up a ground assault on Gaza July 5 in a bid to retrieve Shalit, snatched in a deadly raid on June 25, and stop Palestinian rocket attacks.
Three rockets fired from Gaza exploded in the southern Israeli town of Sderot on Friday but caused no damage or any casualties, the military said.
The armed wing of radical movement Islamic Jihad claimed to have fired one rocket on Sderot in response to continued Israeli "aggression".
One Palestinian was killed late Thursday when a tank fired a shell at a vehicle moving towards Israeli forces stationed in the Qarara in southern Gaza.
But tanks and armoured jeeps positioned in the centre near the Deir al-Balah refugee camp and the town of Khan Yunis withdrew from the area Friday, witnesses and the army said.
Ahmed al-Kurd, the Hamas mayor of Deir al-Balah, said at least 30 hectares of farmland and orchard, largely olive trees, were badly damaged by the Israeli troops in the town and around 20 homes partially or entirely destroyed.
"There is a lot of damage to Salaheddin street (the main road running north and south in the Gaza Strip). We are trying to repair it but that won't be easy," said Khan Yunis governor Osama Farra.
An army spokeswoman said the only place where Israeli ground forces remain in Gaza is in Dahaniya, in the south, near the former international airport that was destroyed by the army after the second Palestinian uprising erupted.
The pullback came after Israel's chief ally the United States vetoed a UN resolution urging Israel to halt military operations in Gaza, condemning the assault and calling for the immediate withdrawal of its troops.
US Ambassador John Bolton said the veto was because of the "unbalanced" nature of the draft text which he argued laid a disproportionate amount of blame on Israel for the current crisis in the region. The text had also condemned the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel and Shalit's abduction.
What has become the worst Israeli-Palestinian crisis in months was sparked when the 19-year-old was snatched by Palestinian militants, including members of the armed wing of Hamas, on the Gaza border.
Faced with twin Israeli offensives in Gaza and Lebanon, following Wednesday's abduction of two soldiers by Hezbollah, Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas issued a stark warning against the eruption of "regional war".
Shalit's captors have, like Hezbollah, demanded the release of prisoners in exchange for their hostage.
But Israel has refused any talks with the Islamist movement that advocates the destruction of the Jewish state, or to engage in a prisoner swap, vowing the assault will continue "in places, in time, in measures" at its convenience.
Comment on this Article
More than 20 rockets fired at Israel
AFP
July 14, 2006
NAHARIYA, Israel - More than 20 rockets have been fired by guerrillas in Lebanon into northern Israel, where two people were killed in similar attacks a day earlier.
Four rockets exploded in the centre of the Mediterranean coastal resort of Nahariya, unleashing a fire and damaging houses and businesses but not causing any casualties, an army spokeswoman said Friday.
Another three rockets landed in Safed, missing buildings, while seven more hit the outskirts.
One person was slightly wounded, the spokeswoman said.
Several Katyusha rockets also landed near army bases and outposts near the border with Lebanon but did not cause casualties or damage.
On Thursday, two Israeli civilians were killed and more than 50 were wounded in similar rocket attacks on the north.
Around 130 rockets have been fired from southern Lebanon in the past 48 hours, a military source said, including on the port of Haifa.
In the south, three makeshift rockets fired by Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip landed in the southern desert town of Sderot, exploding but causing no casualties or damage, the military said.
The Al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of militant Palestinian group Islamic Jihad, issued a statement saying it had fired one rocket at Sderot "as part of our response to the Israeli aggression".
Separately, the armed wing of the Hamas Islamist group, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, said in a statement it had fired a rocket towards the southern Israeli coastal town of Ashkelon. The attack could not be independently confirmed.
Israel launched two deadly offensives, in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip, following the capture of two soldiers by Hezbollah guerrillas Wednesday and last month's seizure of another serviceman by Palestinian militants -- among them Hamas loyalists.
At least 76 Palestinians have been killed in the Gaza offensive and at least 50 people have been killed by Israel's relentless attacks on Lebanon.
Comment on this Article
US vetoes UN resolution urging end to Israeli attacks in Gaza
AFP
July 13, 2006
The United States vetoed a UN draft resolution that would have called for an end to Israeli attacks and "disproportionate use of force" in the Gaza Strip as well as for the release of a kidnapped Israeli soldier.
The Security Council resolution received 10 votes, one against from the United States with four abstentions, French Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, the council president for July, announced.
Explaining his negative vote, US Ambassador John Bolton described the text as "unbalanced" and was "not only untimely but also outmoded" because of the attacks against Israel by Lebanese Hezbollah militants and UN chief Kofi Annan's decision to send a crisis team to the region.
He said adoption of the resolution would have exacerbated tensions in the region and would have undermined "our vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security."
The United States, Israel's staunchest ally, last used its veto in the Security Council in October 2004, to block a similar draft demanding that Israel end all military operations in northern Gaza and withdraw from the area.
Comment: Bolton said, "...adoption of the resolution would have exacerbated tensions in the region and would have undermined 'our vision of two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security.'"
How exactly does calling for an end to "disproportionate use of force" exacerbate the tension in the Middle East?! Bolton must logically believe that more violence in the Middle East is a good thing.
Comment on this Article
Israeli Web Sites Attacked
RedHerring
July 13, 2006
The fighting along Israel's northern border with Lebanon has brought with it an upsurge in attacks on Israeli-related web sites in the past 24 hours, Israeli web sites reported Thursday.
As the violence escalated, hackers from the Islamic world have targeted web sites hosted by all of Israel's major Internet service providers.
To counter the threat, the ISPs added even more security to protect their servers from the latest round of digital warfare. Most of the attacks are coming from hackers located in Morocco and Turkey.
"We witnessed hundreds of application layer attacks against Israeli-related web sites," said Ariel Pisetsky, manager of engineering and security at NetVision, one of Israel's leading ISPs. He added that this kind of attack has become increasingly prevalent in recent years.
Local ISPs are deploying more aggressive security to deal with the threat. The latest onslaught came within hours of Wednesday morning's outbreak of hostilities. The hackers look for vulnerabilities on Israeli web sites and domains.
They search for domains ending with the suffix co.il. Typically the hacker searches for file-uploading or scripting capabilities. Once the vulnerability of these capabilities is located, files are uploaded to deface the site.
Rapid Response
NetVision and other ISPs responded within a matter of minutes. "Our immediate response was to make it far more difficult for all users to enter the web sites," noted Mr. Pisetsky.
In NetVision's case, the company immediately deployed two new security technologies that it began testing in recent weeks on a trial basis on the servers that had come under attack.
Israeli ISPs are tightlipped about the latest security software systems they are deploying to counter the sharp rise in application layer attacks, but many are being developed by local startup companies.
"This field of security is very hot and a number of local startups are focusing their attention on this space," said Dan Yachin, a Tel Aviv-based research director for emerging technologies at IDC.
Comment on this Article
Dollars and Nonsense
Oil hits record over $78
By Paul Marriott
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006
SYDNEY - Oil prices surged to record highs above $78 on Friday as global geopolitical storm clouds gathered, with supply disruption in OPEC exporter Nigeria and tensions across the Middle East driving crude into unchartered territory.
U.S. crude for August surged $1.40 to $78.10 a barrel by 0147 GMT, after hitting a record $78.40 as gains came on top of Thursday's $1.75 rally. London Brent was $1.01 up at $77.70, also touching a record after Thursday's $2.30 jump.
Escalating conflict between Israel and Lebanon and fresh supply fears in the world's eighth-largest exporter, Nigeria, took center stage, firing prices 1.8 percent above Thursday's close and over $80 a barrel for fourth-quarter delivery contracts.
Iran's nuclear stand-off with the West limped back to the U.N. Security Council, North Korea stormed out of talks with South Korea, and falling crude stocks in the world's top oil consumer, the United States, continued to bolster prices.
"Oil is being hit from all fronts by geopolitical problems," said Mark Pervan, a resources analyst at Daiwa Securities. "A raft of problems could keep prices at record levels for some time."
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday warned that any Israeli strike on Syria would be considered an attack on the whole Islamic world that would provoke "a fierce response."
Israeli jets struck Hizbollah's southern Beirut stronghold on Friday, a day after blockading Lebanese ports and bombing Beirut's airport in reprisals against the Lebanese guerrilla group's capture of two Israeli soldiers.
Neither Israel nor Lebanon are oil producers but both lie at the heart of the Middle East, which collectively pumps nearly a third of global output, leaving oil traders very nervous.
"Israel has flared up badly this week, but it's tension which has been brewing for years," said Daiwa's Pervan. "Then there's Nigeria, where instability is endemic, politics is in turmoil and it's unlikely to change before elections next year."
In Nigeria, two suspected explosions at a crude pipeline operated by Agip, a unit of Italy's Eni, caused oil spills, Nigerian officials said. Eni denied reports of sabotage and extensive oil spills and said the damage would be repaired soon.
It spells fresh uncertainty in Nigeria after Royal Dutch Shell has already shut down 473,000 barrels per day of supply, almost a quarter of output in Africa's top oil supplier, due to attacks by rebel militants.
LOWER STOCK CUSHION
Oil in New York is up around 28 percent in 2006, rallying from below $20 in January 2002 amid rising demand led by the United States and the second-largest oil consumer China, together with a series of real or potential supply disruptions.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the world's fourth-largest oil exporter would not abandon its right to nuclear technology as Tehran's case was referred back to the U.N. Security Council after it delayed accepting a package of incentives designed to prevent it developing nuclear weapons.
"With Israel and Nigeria, Iran completes the triumvirate of key tensions supporting prices," said Daiwa's Pervan.
Elsewhere, in Asia, North Korea blamed the South for the collapse of their first high-level talks since Pyongyang's missile tests sparked a regional crisis last week, saying Seoul would "pay a price" for the failure.
Robust U.S. demand in the face of high prices and falling inventories also supported oil's gain.
"Today's records are a supply-side story not a demand story," said Pervan. "But the draw on U.S. stocks was really severe and you can't underestimate the effect on prices."
U.S. crude inventories slid 6 million barrels last week as imports fell, a government report said Wednesday, five times the decline forecast in a Reuters poll.
Comment on this Article
Markets slide on oil price and war threats
By Andrew Dewson
The Independent
14 July 2006
Global equity markets suffered a big sell-off yesterday as concerns over the price of oil again threatened economic growth. Brent crude futures prices hit a record $76.18 per barrel in London trade as a combination of war threats in the Middle East, Iran and North Korea and violence in Nigeria pushed prices higher with no sign of weakening demand. The FTSE 100 fell by 95.6 points, its biggest fall for a month, while the Dow Jones closed down 166.89 points after falling 121 on Wednesday.
In Hong Kong, the Hang Seng was down 216 points overnight, while in Japan, the Nikkei dropped more than 150 points. The FTSE 100 should benefit more than other markets because of its heavy weighting in oils stocks, with BP, Shell and Cairn Energy making up almost one quarter of the total index. However, if the oil price continues to rise there will be no escape from higher costs and slowing economic growth.
Only a month ago, BP's chief executive, Lord Browne of Madingley, predicted that long-term oil prices would eventually fall to below $30 per barrel, a prediction that now looks less credible. Increased use of technology and exploration success may drive prices down eventually, but with increasing political and military tension in the world's oil-producing nations and unquenchable demand from developed and developing economies, the oil price is showing few signs of any meaningful decline.
Georgina Taylor, a UK equity strategist at the investment bank Goldman Sachs, says that stock markets have been slow to price in higher oil prices. She said: "The oil price has been ignored to a certain extent, and while forecasts for cost increases are rising the market is still behind the oil price. Should the price of oil rise to, say, $100 per barrel, there would be a hugely negative impact on global equity markets, real incomes and growth. That said, the London market should be best positioned of the major markets to benefit from a higher oil price and fundamentally UK equities remain good value."
Despite concerns over the oil price and yesterday's record prices, in real terms the per-barrel value was higher during the oil shock of the 1970s. According to BP, oil hit an inflation-adjusted average of $87.65 per barrel during 1980, a period also marked by high inflation, slow economic growth and higher interest rates. Even so, oil is more expensive in real terms now than it has been since 1983.
One oil trader said: "Last year, global geopolitical tensions were exacerbated by the extremely active hurricane season in the United States. All the predictions are that this year will be every bit as active, and the situation in Israel looks like it is spiralling out of control."
He added: "In these circumstances, oil prices are only going to head in one direction. Unless Opec bows to political pressure from consumers and opens the floodgates, oil is going to stay expensive for the foreseeable future."
Comment on this Article
Bank of Japan ends over five years of zero interest rates
AFP
Friday July 14, 2006
The Bank of Japan has ended over five years of zero interest rates in a watershed decision for the world's number two economy which has finally escaped from its long deflationary spiral.
The unanimous decision by the BoJ's policy board Friday to raise the overnight call rate target by a quarter point to 0.25 percent is the strongest sign yet that Japan's economy has returned to normality after years of emergency measures.
It was the first interest rise in Japan for almost six years, reflecting a global trend of monetary tightening and an end to the era of easy credit that will force Japanese to kick their addiction to virtually free money.
"The Japanese economy has been in a difficult period for over 10 years but thanks to efforts by the private and public sectors it is beginning to return to a normal state," said BoJ governor Toshihiko Fukui.
"We think prices will remain on a steady upward trend. The risk of a return to deflation has dissolved," he told a press conference.
The Bank of Japan sought to assuage worries that the rate rise might stifle economic growth, saying further increases would be made only gradually and that rates would be kept "very low" for some time.
Fukui said the BoJ had no plans for a series of consecutive interest rate rises at future meetings.
Even so, many analysts were pencilling in another interest rate rise before the end of the year.
"Recent history suggests we should be very sceptical of verbal assurances that policy will only tighten gradually," warned Richard Jerram, chief economist for Japan at Macquarie Securities.
But he added: "We think the very slow acceleration in inflation is likely to be an impediment to a rapid string of rate hikes."
The policy board also increased the official discount rate, or the rate at which it lends directly to commercial banks, to 0.4 percent from 0.1 percent.
The central bank first adopted the zero-rate policy in February 1999 to try to stop Asia's largest economy from falling into a deflationary spiral.
With the economy seemingly on the mend, the BoJ increased its overnight call rate to 0.25 percent from zero percent in August 2000.
But the economy quickly reversed course and it was forced to drop the rate back to zero again in March 2001, when it also introduced its unprecedented quantitative easing policy -- flooding the system with cash -- which it ditched in March.
Fukui said he was confident that the central bank had not made a similar blunder this time.
"If you compare the situation in 2000 with the current situation, the foundations of the economy's growth have grown more robust and its vulnerability to shocks has declined."
Asia's largest economy now finally seems to be out of deflation, with core consumer prices up for a seventh straight month in May and the overall economy on track to its longest post-war expansion.
But it has left a hangover -- public debt now stands at over 150 percent of Japan's annual economic output after the government spent trillions of yen trying to revive the economy when the economic bubble burst in the early 1990s.
The end to zero interest rates was made in spite of calls from several government ministers, including Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki who said just this week that there was no need yet for an interest rate rise.
However, Japanese Economic and Fiscal Policy Minister Kaoru Yosano on Friday gave his approval for an rate rise, saying it was the "right thing" to do as zero rates were an exceptional policy.
The BoJ's historic decision has also been overshadowed somewhat by controversy over the BoJ governor's links to a scandal-tainted investment fund, with polls showing a large majority of Japanese wanting Fukui to resign.
The BoJ chief indicated Friday he still has no plans to stand down, saying he wanted to fulfill his responsibility as central bank governor.
Financial markets took the rate rise news in their stride, focusing instead on high oil prices and violence in the Middle East as they fell sharply.
Comment on this Article
Why Dell, Apple Declined: The US Computer Industry Slump
By Catherine Holahan
BusinessWeek Online
JULY 13, 2006
The second quarter is rarely a good time for computer makers. Back-to-school buying won't get started in earnest for months, the holidays are half a year away-in both directions-and corporate IT budgets are still far from spent. But there's growing concern that this year's lull is hitting especially hard.
Concerns over the U.S. computer industry surfaced on July 12, as some prominent Wall Street analysts made bearish remarks about Dell, the world's largest PC maker, and Apple, which makes computers and the popular iPod digital music player.
By the end of the trading day, tech stocks had taken a beating, with computer makers some of the biggest losers. Dell shares fell more than 4%, while Apple slumped almost 5%. Hewlett Packard dipped 2.7%.
DEMAND DOWN. While the day's losses were pegged to company-specific issues, some analysts say growth for the entire year will be slower than previously thought. Among the concerns: delays in key computer-related technologies including the latest Microsoft operating system and next-generation DVD players.
Some are concerned price wars are imminent and that economic slowdown could crimp overall demand. "There's a softness in the market that's building," says Richard Shim, a senior research analyst at IDC. In the past two weeks, IDC cut its 2006 forecast for U.S. PC growth to 5.7%, from 6.8%. "In '04 and '05 there was tremendous growth. In a market that's as mature as this industry is, there's no way you can maintain those levels."
Dell fed worries on July 12 by announcing that the following day it would unveil a "major pricing initiative" for U.S. consumers and small businesses. The same day, UBS Investment Research (UBS) said it was cutting earnings estimates for Dell on the belief the company "continues to be impacted by competition and adverse mix shifts within the PC market." Dell's performance in recent quarters (it lost U.S. share to rivals in the first three months of the year) has given investors little reason for confidence-though the company has embarked on a turnaround campaign that includes beefing up customer service (see BW, 6/19/06, "Dell: Facing Up To Past Mistakes").
Credit Suisse (CSR) issued a report the same day that did a number on Apple's stock. The computer maker, which reports fiscal third-quarter results July 19, will probably issue sales and earnings forecasts for the current period that falls short of analysts' expectations, Credit Suisse analyst Robert Semple wrote.
Apple is likely to tell analysts that fourth-quarter sales will be $4.6 billion to $4.8 billion, compared with analysts' estimates for sales of $5 billion, the report says. "We expect Apple will once again use the September quarter to reduce iPod inventories as the company prepares for a refresh of its product lineup."
NEW PRODUCT DELAYS. Apple has been dogged by reports from analysts at other firms that the next version of the popular iPod music player will be delayed. If that's the case, Apple won't be alone in experiencing tech delays. Microsoft has already owned up to delays in Vista, the next version of its operating system, and Office, its package of business-productivity applications. That in turn could affect the timing of PC purchases, say analysts including Wendy Abramowitz, a senior analyst at Argus Research.
Backers of the competing next-generation DVD technologies weren't ready with their wares as early as planned either, notes Shim at IDC.
So how long will the bearish sentiment linger? Shim sees the market "bouncing back in '07." NPD analyst Stephen Baker is even more upbeat. "We continue to be very bullish about the third quarter," he says. Not only will consumers be buying machines for students, but many are upgrading to notebooks and adding second computers for the home, he says.
Comment on this Article
Intel to ax 1,000 managers
By Stephen Shankland and Michael Kanellos
CNET News.com
July 13, 2006
Intel will begin cutting about 1,000 manager jobs worldwide this week as part of an effort to become more competitive.
"This step is important because it addresses a key problem we've found in our efficiency analysis: slow and ineffective decision-making, resulting, in part, from too many management layers," Chief Executive Paul Otellini told employees in a memo sent out Thursday and seen by CNET News.com.
Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy confirmed the layoffs Thursday, saying they would "both reduce costs and improve decision-making and communications." He didn't disclose the financial costs or benefits of the cuts, but said Intel plans to share more details Wednesday when it discusses financial results for the last quarter.
The restructuring and regrouping effort comes after two years of sluggish performance at Intel. In 2004, the company had to delay or cancel a number of products. In 2005, Intel steadily lost market share to rival Advance Micro Devices.
"Intel has been besieged by slowing PC market demand and uncharacteristically fierce competition from rival AMD. The primary concerns facing Intel's operations are declining revenues and profitability," said Martin Kariithi, an analyst at Technology Business Review.
The move, along with the sale of some communications processor assets to Marvell Technology Group in June, is part of an efficiency review Intel launched in April to become more competitive. More cuts are likely as a result of the review, Otellini said.
"You should expect that we will continue to take actions, including selective reductions, as we complete analyses and decisions about investments, expense levels and organizational structures," Otellini said in the memo. "Over the last five years at Intel, the number of managers has grown faster than our overall employee population. Our efficiency analysis and industry benchmarking have shown that we have too many management layers, top to bottom, to be effective."
Kariithi estimated that the revenue per Intel employee dropped from $408,175 in the fourth quarter of 2005 to $371,075 in the first quarter of 2006, but he expects another layoff to be announced during the financial results announcement.
To return revenue per employee to where it was a year ago, Kariithi said, Intel will have to lay off 10 percent of its staff--about 10,000 people.
Although AMD has been gaining share against its rival, it has had its own difficulties as well. Last week, the company announced revenue of $1.21 billion, significantly less than the $1.3 billion average expected by analysts and a 9 percent decrease over the first quarter.
Most managers losing their jobs will be notified Thursday and Friday, Otellini said, and will get a minimum of three months' separation pay.
Henri Richard, executive vice president of sales and marketing at AMD, earlier this year said that AMD made some of its gains in part because of Intel's complacency. Characterizing Intel as fat and sluggish has become a recurring theme with AMD.
Institutional intertia
In an interview Wednesday, Thomas Sonderman, director of automated precision manufacturing at AMD, said that the chipmaker realized in the 1990s that it never would be able to have as large a factory footprint as Intel. As a result, it optimized what it could do in a single factory.
"We didn't have the luxury to be fat, dumb and happy," he said.
Otellini rebuffed the notion that Intel had become self-satisfied earlier this year. Still, Intel has had trouble overcoming institutional inertia. In early 2004, CNET News.com asked then-CEO Craig Barrett and Otellini if the company's emerging problems were the result of overconfidence. The two said no, arguing that the problems that had emerged had fairly specific causes. A few months and a few more product problems later, Barrett issued an internal memo warning employees that the company had become somewhat complacent and needed to refocus.
Despite the warning, Intel didn't rebound. And employee head count went from about 85,000 at the end of 2004 to 100,000 at the end of 2005.
Otellini called for a thorough examination during the first-quarter earnings call in April. The project was then reiterated at a meeting with analysts.
The 90-day efficiency review began in late April and therefore should be complete in coming weeks. Mulloy declined to say when actions resulting from the review would be done because the company doesn't yet know, he said.
That review has already resulted in the sale of Intel's XScale communications and applications chip technology to Marvell. There have been some smaller actions from the review, Mulloy said, including the closure of a 19-person lab in Glasgow, Scotland.
Intel periodically conducts purges. After a mini downturn in 1998, the company reduced head count through voluntary departures and layoffs. After bulking up with several acquisitions in the dot-com era, the company subsequently whacked divisions and sold off other groups.
In Thursday's memo, Otellini sought to fan Intel employees' competitive fires.
"We have done extremely well over the past 25 years of the PC era. But we need to adjust now for where our industry is going. Competition will intensify across our product lines. Pricing will be aggressive," he said. "Our objective, and our destiny, is to refashion Intel now while we have the means and the time to do so, and ensure we continue to remain No. 1."
Comment on this Article
States sue chip makers over price-fixing
By Michael Kahn and Kiyoshi Takenaka
Reuters
July 14, 2006
SAN FRANCISCO/TOKYO - Global computer memory chip makers including Samsung Electronics Co. and Micron Technology Inc. were sued on Thursday by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer for allegedly conspiring to raise memory chip prices.
The action will be followed on Friday by a similar but separate suit by California and 33 other U.S. states against seven memory chip makers such as Micron, Infineon Technologies AG and Hynix Semiconductor Inc..
The multi-state lawsuit, which seeks damages estimated as high as hundreds of millions of dollars, does not name Samsung, the world's largest memory chip maker, to provide a window to reach a potential settlement, said Tom Dresslar, a spokesman for California Attorney General Bill Lockyer.
South Korea's Samsung expected the lawsuit to be "resolved smoothly," and had provisioned for such lawsuits, according to Chu Woo-sik, the senior vice president of Samsung's IR team.
The suits come at a time when dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chip makers enjoy relatively steady prices and look for firmer demand toward the year-end shopping season and the consumer launch early next year of Microsoft Corp.'s Vista operating system.
Lockyer said on Thursday that he, joined by 33 other state attorneys general, would file the complaint alleging the chip makers violated state and federal antitrust laws during a conspiracy to fix prices for DRAM chips, from 1998 through June 2002, when there was a glut in the market.
The lawsuits follows a U.S. Justice Department probe launched in 2002 that resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in fines levied against Samsung, Hynix, Infineon, Elpida Memory Inc. and other chip makers.
The federal investigation followed a sharp plunge in the prices for memory chips used in computers and other electronics, which forced a wave of industry consolidation and pushed several chip makers near bankruptcy.
"If these suits are completed by the end of the year and the scale of fines are fixed, that would be a substantial blow to each company," said a Tokyo-based analyst at a European brokerage.
"But that is rather unlikely. The more likely scenario is that they would set aside reserves gradually as the suits progress, harming their profit margins."
The multi-state complaint accuses the companies of fixing DRAM chip prices, artificially restraining supply and rigging bids for contracts.
Those actions caused computer makers such as Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co. to pay more for chips and then pass those costs on to consumers, said Florida Attorney General Charlie Crist, another lead plaintiff in the case.
Micron spokesman Dan Francisco said he could not comment specifically on the lawsuit because the company had not yet seen it. But he noted that the Boise, Idaho-based chip maker has been in talks to resolve the issue.
"We have been involved in discussions with state attorneys general for a long period of time," Francisco said. "As I understand it they wanted to get these cases on file while we discuss the potential for resolution."
Germany's Infineon could not immediately be reached for comment.
The multi-state lawsuit names many of the world's top-ranked memory chip makers including Hynix; Taiwan's Mosel Vitelic and Nanya Technology Corp.; Japan's Elpida and NEC Electronics Corp.'s NEC Electronics America.
Samsung shares fell 2.67 percent to close at 584,000 won after it reported an 11 percent drop in its quarterly profit, and Hynix lost 3.13 percent to 30,900 won. The benchmark Korea Composite Stock Price Index ended down 2.33 percent.
Shares in NEC Electronics closed down 2.03 percent at 3,380, and Elpida lost 1.99 percent to 4,430 yen, roughly in line with the Tokyo stock market's electrical machinery index.
An Elpida spokeswoman said she could not comment since it was still in the process of looking into the matter. An NEC Electronics spokesman said it was too early to make any comment.
Comment on this Article
Militarism and the Corporate Welfare State
By Charles Sullivan
www.opednews.com
July 11, 2006
Right wing politicos and their conservative constituents are always bemoaning big government. Yet wealthy people of all political stripes constantly use big government to their own benefit. The rich widely assume, falsely, I think, that what is good for them is good for the country. By extension they also assume that what is good for the corporations is good for the people. But that has never been the case. No one should be allowed to make a living on the misery of others.
The latter seems odd, given that business people are always harping about getting the government out of our (their) lives; all the while they are using government to obtain no bid contracts, to write legislation in the corporate interest, stocking the judiciary with pro-corporate judges, redrawing political districts and using the military to invade and occupy sovereign nations in order to privatize them. Iraq provides a compelling case study.
Of course, what businessmen really mean by getting government off our backs is preventing government from regulating commerce, as if there were some connection between capital and democracy, democracy and freedom. In corporate speak democracy and free trade has nothing to do with human beings and their freedoms. What Bush and his kind are really talking about is absolute corporate rule and continued Plutocracy.
According to author Antonia Juhasz, "Prior to the first Gulf War in 1991 and even after eight years of war with Iran, Iraq was ranked 15 out of 130 countries on the 1990 United Nations Human Development Index. Before the first Bush invasion, Iraq had the highest percentage of college-educated citizens in the Middle East and above average overall literacy rates. According to the World Health Organization, prior to 1991 health care reached approximately 97 percent of the urban population and 78 percent of rural residents, while the infant mortality rate was well below average for developing countries. "
Constitutional government was established in Iraq in 1922. Prior to the 1991 U.S. invasion, Iraq was in essence a socialist government, since most of its political and economic infrastructure, including its burgeoning oil industry was nationalized. Despite Saddam Hussein's abuse of the constitution (the U.S. is suffering similar abuses under Bush), the Iraqi people enjoyed a high standard of living and many freedoms. This allowed them benefits such as socialized health care and access to free higher education that Americans have never known.
All of those freedoms and the high standard of living were demolished with the U.S. invasion and permanent occupation of Iraq. A huge corporate fire sale was under way.
Under the imposed dictatorship of Paul Bremmer granted under the Coalition Provisional Authority during the first months of the occupation, all of Iraq's 192 state-owned enterprises were privatized and divided among 150 U.S. corporations that have so far realized more than $50 billion in profits. Every aspect of the Iraqi economy was dismantled, privatized, and divided up among corporate America with no benefit to the Iraqi people.
With the U.S. occupation the Iraqi Constitution was torn asunder and replaced with a new charter that places Iraq under virtual corporate rule. Under the U.S. imposed Corporate Constitution, the Iraqis no longer have access to clean water, reliable electricity, medicine, healthcare, or higher education. Ownership of Iraq's once prosperous economy, including her extensive oil fields, was transferred from the Iraqi people to U.S. corporations.
This is the democracy we have brought to Iraq, punctuated by suffering, misery, and death. When innocent blood flows so too does the money. See how the stocks of Halliburton and Bechtel rose with the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
The blueprint for the economic plunder of Iraq was orchestrated by Bearing Point, Inc. of Mclean, Virginia. The Bearing Point plan turns Iraq from a socialist state to a full bore capitalist entity over three years. For their services Bearing Point made the tidy sum of $250 million.
Not surprisingly, Bremmer has strong ties with corporate America and such luminaries of dementia as Donald Rumsfeld, Henry Kissinger and George Schultz that extend more than a quarter of a century. All of these men have economic ties with the same businesses that stole Iraq's wealth. Each of them has realized great personal fortune by profiteering on the spoils of war and occupation: policies they helped to forge.
The government is studded with men like Paul Bremmer and Henry Kissinger, who migrate back and forth from corporate America into the halls of government, create policy that is favorable to their own business interests, then return to business to realize the wealth they have created for themselves and their shareholders. It is men like them who are responsible for America's aggressive war posture, among them the quagmire in Iraq.
Consider the ties regarding officials in the Bush regime and the Halliburton- military-war profiteering connection, as documented by Antonia Juhasz in The Bush Agenda:
- Joe Lopez, a retired four star general and former aide to Cheney joined Halliburton in 1999.
- Dave Gribbon, Cheney's former assistant in Congress was Halliburton's Vice President and returned to the Whitehouse with Cheney when Bush stole the 2000 election.
- Ray Hunt, who provided money to both of the Bush presidencies joined Halliburton in 1998 and serves to this day.
- Lawrence Eagleberger, former president of Kissinger Associates and Bush, senior's Secretary of State also served on Halliburton's board of directors
- Charles Dominy, a retired three star general and former Halliburton executive currently serves as Halliburton's chief lobbyist.
Halliburton is only one of many corporations profiting from the invasion and the permanent occupation of Iraq. Other corporations have people as favorably placed in the Bush regime as Halliburton. Bechtel, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Electric-all the usual suspects-are well represented in the government; and all of them lobbied extensively for war and occupation. They have no intentions of stopping in Iraq either. The world is their oyster and the military can procure it for them.
It is worth noting that crony appointments are not peculiar to the Bush regime or to the Republican Party. They have a long and sordid history. That is how business is conducted and fortunes are made-through outright theft and conquest. None of this would be possible without the military. Our soldiers are the pawns of the rich but they think they are making the world safe for democracy. All they are doing in fact is opening the world up to capitalism and private ownership.
Since the occupation began in 2003 the Iraqi people have been forced to exist under conditions of extreme brutality and abject poverty. After the deliberate bombing of water sanitation facilities, hospitals, and electric generating sites there have been outbreaks of disease such as tuberculosis and dysentery, causing suffering and death. There has been no peace and no security for the innocent victims of unbridled greed.
There is also the matter of depleted uranium munitions used by U.S. forces that litters the country in aerosolized form that is easily taken up by the wind and remains radioactive forever. Depleted uranium is an indiscriminate killer whose effects linger for generations in the bodies of the occupiers and the occupied. Can you say Agent Orange? That is the great free market democracy that we have brought to the Middle East.
The war machine keeps turning like a sausage grinder, spewing its product into the coffers of the rich. Into the hopper go our sons and daughters and dark-skinned nations-out comes sausage and huge bank rolls for Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld and corporate America. Corporations, government, and militarism comprise the unholy trinity of capitalism. Together they form a corporate welfare state that boggles the mind.
The American military is not abroad defending freedom and sowing the seeds of democracy, as they seem to believe. One need only examine the history of this nation to recognize the familiar patterns of conquest and oppression. The occupation of Iraq is the continuation of the policies that created the institution of slavery, following the genocide of the Indians. The military, far from being a defender of peace and freedom, has evolved into an extension of the corporate welfare state.
The world will know no peace until enough citizens are sufficiently aroused to dismantle the military apparatus. Furthermore, we must recognize the link between militarism, war, and capital and build a better system-a form of government that serves the people rather than capital. Code Pink and other groups that maintain a constant presence in Washington are on the right track. They deserve our full support.
Charles Sullivan is a photographer, social activist and free lance writer residing in the hinterland of West Virgina. He welcomes your comments at earthdog@highstream.net
Comment on this Article
Bushwhacked
US admits more troops are needed
By Faye Bradbury
The Independent
14 July 2006
General George Casey, the top US commander in Iraq, has admitted that extra American troops may be drafted into Baghdad and the surrounding area to combat the recent surge in sectarian killings.
Highlighting the growing risk from insurgents killing Shia Muslims, and from Shia militias responsible for the indiscriminate killing of Sunnis, General Casey said more troops were needed to tackle "death squads".
"So you have both sides now attacking civilians, and that has caused the recent spike in violence", he said at a joint press conference yesterday with the US Secretary of Defence, Dick Cheney, who was on a surprise visit to Iraq. Asked if the violence might mean more troops in Baghdad, General Casey replied: "It may, yes."
Dozens have died in or around Baghdad during the past four days. The situation has been described as a low-level civil war.
On Sunday, more than 40 Sunni Arabs were massacred by Shia gunmen. The killings were prompted by the bombing of Shia shrines the previous day.
Comment on this Article
US sees three more years in building Afghan army
By Will Dunham
Reuters
Thu Jul 13, 2006
WASHINGTON - It will take three more years for the U.S.-trained Afghan army, intended to assume security responsibilities now shouldered by foreign forces in Afghanistan, to reach the planned goal of 70,000 soldiers, a U.S. commander said on Thursday.
Army Maj. Gen. Robert Durbin, who heads the U.S. effort to train and equip Afghan government security forces, said the national army numbers "a little bit over 30,000," and that it is growing at a rate of 1,000 per month, with a plan to reach 70,000 in roughly three years.
As in Iraq, U.S. officials have emphasized the importance of forming capable government security forces to take up the task of bringing law and order to a war-ravaged country. U.S. commanders in Iraq have pledged to have a 137,500-strong Iraqi army fully manned by the end of this year.
It has been almost five years since U.S.-led forces toppled Afghanistan's Taliban leaders, blamed for harboring the al Qaeda network responsible for the 2001 attacks on America, and U.S. forces have been helping build a new national army from scratch in a country battered by decades of strife.
Durbin, commander of Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, told a Pentagon briefing that Afghan security forces are making steady progress, but overcoming absenteeism and developing capable leaders remain "a challenge."
He said 3,500 U.S. troops out of an American force of 23,000 in Afghanistan are dedicated to training the Afghan army and police.
Afghanistan is experiencing the bloodiest phase of Taliban violence since 2001, as groups of Taliban fighters have entered large parts of the south and east and unleashed a fierce wave of bombings, ambushes and raids.
SHORTAGE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT
Durbin said there are about 62,000 police officers in Afghanistan. About 58,000 are considered trained but only 37,000 are considered equipped. He said 86,000 vehicles are needed for the national police, and there are only 2,000 now.
He said will take "at least the next year or two" to make the police force fully trained and equipped.
Asked why it will take three more years to have the all-volunteer Afghan army at full strength, Durbin said, "Based on how we have put the program together, we feel that the 1,000 a month is appropriate to retain the quality and establish the quantity that we feel is effective."
Durbin said some of the first Afghans who volunteered for three-year stints in the army are reaching the end of these terms, and about 35 percent are re-enlisting, well below the goal of 50 percent.
Durbin cited illiteracy in the ranks as an issue facing Afghan forces.
"We must all be clear to understand that illiterate definitely does not mean stupid. It means a different learning technique. And the Afghan soldiers are very quick to learn and to pick up the training. They are very intelligent in that respect," he said.
Durbin said U.S. trainers are mindful about weeding out corruption in the police forces.
"There are perhaps many bad lessons or behaviors that these policemen have learned, and they don't understand the true essence of rule of law and to serve and protect," Durbin said.
Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak was quoted this week as saying an Afghan army of 150,000 to 200,000 would be needed to secure the country.
Durbin said that while the plan is for an army of 70,000, he did not rule out a larger force sometime in the future. "The government of Afghanistan, in consultation with the international community, may revisit that number," he said.
Comment on this Article
Pa. mayor tells illegal immigrants to go
By MARK SCOLFORO
Associated Press
Fri Jul 14, 2006
HAZLETON, Pa. - Illegal immigrants seeking to make a home in this northeastern Pennsylvania city could face barriers to finding a home and job after the city council passed one of the nation's strictest ordinances to fight illegal immigration.
City documents would be printed in English, landlords would face $1,000 fines for each illegal immigrant found renting their properties and business who employ illegal immigrants wouldn't be granted licenses.
The ordinance, designed to make the city one of the most hostile in the country for illegal immigrants, passed on a 4-to-1 vote after two hours of passionate debate.
"The illegal citizens, I would recommend they leave," said Mayor Lou Barletta, who said he wore a bulletproof vest to the vote as a precaution because the issue was emotionally charged.
The measure has divided the former coal town about 80 miles northwest of Philadelphia and thrust the 31,000-population city to the fore of the national debate on illegal immigration. After the vote, hundreds of people on both sides of the issue congregated outside City Hall, separated by a line of police officers brought in anticipation of any trouble.
Barletta proposed the Illegal Immigration Relief Act last month as a response to what he said were Hazleton's problems with violent crime, crowded schools, hospital costs and the demand for services. Opponents argued it was divisive and possibly illegal, but supporters argued illegal immigrants' growing numbers have damaged the quality of life in this northeastern Pennsylvania city.
"What you see here tonight, really, is a city that wants to take back what America has given it," Barletta said.
Outside City Hall, about people gathered with opponents of the measure, some with signs that read "Bias," separated by a line of police from supporters, some waving American flags.
Anna Arias asked the council, "Are any of us ready to support U.S. citizens born of someone who is undocumented?" Several people in the audience responded, "Yes!"
She warned the council that approving the ordinance would make Hazleton "the first Nazi city in the country."
The ordinance adopted at the meeting had been extensively amended from an earlier draft; one change would deny a license to any business that provides goods or services to an illegal immigrant. City solicitor Christopher B. Slusser said the provision would likely be invoked only against business people who knowingly violated it, and the city would deal with violators "on a case-by-case basis."
The number of Hispanic residents in Hazleton has increased dramatically in the past six years. City officials acknowledge they do not know how many are illegal immigrants, whom Barletta has blamed for higher crime rates, failing schools and a diminished quality of life.
In a letter sent to Barletta earlier this week, attorneys with the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund threatened to sue on the grounds that the ordinance infringes upon the federal government's power to regulate immigration.
Other municipalities across the country also have considered acting to address illegal immigration. Ordinances similar to the Hazleton measure have been proposed in the Florida communities of Palm Bay and Avon Park and the California towns of Escondido and San Bernardino.
Carolina Taveras, a 30-year-old naturalized citizen from the Dominican Republic who moved to Hazleton from New York City a year ago, said the mayor's proposal has made her feel unwelcome.
A few doors down from where Taveras was getting her hair done at