As many of you know, Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any government, political group, corporation, or news agency. SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce unwanted bias into our work. The obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the funding to do all the things we would like to do for our readers.

Almost one year ago, SOTT created the Pentagon Strike presentation, which has now been viewed by well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced the song You Lied, performed by Away With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast, beginning a project which we had been trying to get off the ground for over a year.

A SOTT editor poses next to his computer

To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because we love it, and because our readers often write to tell us how they have benefited from our work. In order to continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library. There are many books we would like to have that we cannot afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our future projects that include video, we have and will continue to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page and related projects are created on several computers which are each upwards of five years old. They are very slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular podcasts and videos.

Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.

In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast, Flash presentations, and expand our operations further, we need your support.

At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the Times Commentary books. These books are collections of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards helping to cover our increasing operating costs.

Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming year is 28,000 euros.

-- Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --

Any donation you can make will help us to continue to produce and improve the Signs page.

If you donate 50 euros (approximately US$60; click here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze Supporter.

Bronze Supporters will receive a complementary copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs Commentary book.

If you donate 100 euros, you will be a Silver Supporter.

Silver Supporters will receive a complementary copy of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The Media.

Donations of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold Supporter.

Gold Supporters will receive the entire set of six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The Human Condition, The Media, Religion, US Freedom, and The Work.

Donations of 250 euros will qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.

Platinum Supporters will receive the entire set of six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The Human Condition, The Media, Religion, US Freedom, and The Work. In addition, they will receive one other book of their choice free from our bookstore.

We have more projects like our podcast in the works - but we need your help to make them a reality!

Thank you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team at Signs of the Times!

The sixties defined higher consciousness as psychedelic LSD trips with whirling colours and a perception of the world that seemed immediate and more real than our everyday consciousness, where the emergence of a word to describe any object was so incapable of transmitting the experience of the object that it was best to remain silent. Seeing and understanding were beyond words.

The tradition of magick in the West that has so many strands that go back to the Golden Dawn emphasises the idea that we can control the world around us and bend and shape it to our will.

Theosophy spoke of Ascended Masters who guide our development, watching over us, with whom we can enter into contact to be guided in our own lives.

These ideas are found in the vast majority of so-called spiritual paths promoted in the West today. Often dialogue with people becomes impossible when they resort to the argument that "I know what I experienced and there's no way you can judge it" when pressed about their beliefs. Or "channeled" information is believed and accepted simply because it came through an extraordinary experience, not because the information contained has been independently verified. We still get emails from readers who send us such word salad proclaiming that we will be saved if only we "believe" and "look to the light". People are looking for their "guides", for some other authority to tell them what to do rather than the much more difficult work of figuring out life's problems for oneself. But because they hear voices that are so reassuring and "full of love", they think they are having a "spiritual" experience.

These ideas have shaped our expectations of what spirituality really is, defined our assumptions and anticipations when we embark on what we think is the spiritual path, and finally limit what we seek and what we find. If a teaching isn't "other worldly" enough, we have a mechanical reaction to dismiss it as not being "spiritual". This reaction has been programmed into us, which is one reason why we think that Gurdjieff's description of man as a completely mechanical being is accurate and just.

Our own idea is that spiritual work is much more mundane, that the goal is to see this world as clearly and objectively as possible, to understand the forces at work on our level of existence, and not to try and escape from all the horrors in front of us by ascending to the higher realms while our bodies continue to be subject to the laws of this world. If we are mechanical beings, then the goal is to become less mechanical, to understand our machine and take control of it. Such work is much less trippy than astral travel and demands rigourous awareness and sacrifice. Therefore, it will be less popular in our world of ego gratification and its derivative ideas of "you create your own reality" or "if you shut the negative out of your life, it won't affect you". People who equate "spirituality" with "happiness" or "stress reduction" will not be drawn to a path that demands constant attention to one's thoughts and actions and a rigorous struggle against all forms of automatic behaviour.

However, it is true that there are many "unworldly" things that happen in our world, things that cannot be explained by science and that are therefore dismissed and rejected by those who place rational thinking above an openness to what is. The calculated dismissal and ridicule of these topics and those who investigate them on the part of the scientific community only reinforces the assumptions outlined above among spiritual seekers because enough evidence documenting such experiences exists to suggest that the hard-core materialist scientists who deny it are acting in bad faith -- or are perhaps incapable of seeing them because of their own genetics. Thus the two poles reinforce each other's positions, digging a larger and larger chasm between them, and straw men can be set up on both sides in arguments that pass for refutations of one or the other point of view.

We deal with these anomalous issues from time to time on the Signs page, but it is neither the main focus of our work, nor our major preoccupation. Such events are interesting to us because they help us to see that the world is a very much stranger place than mainstream science would have us believe. The accumulation of evidence points to the reality of the existence of higher planes of existence, to the existence of beings from these realms who have intervened throughout history to influence us in ways very detrimental to our existence, and who call themselves our gods. While our science may not yet be able to incorporate this data into its theories, that is a shortcoming of our science, not a refutation of its reality.

One day science may well have the proof.

Spirituality for us might be defined as the science of what is, and because our own beliefs and assumptions play such an important role in shaping our perception of the world, rooting our these assumptions is the starting point. Some of these assumptions are easy to identify and fairly easy to remove. Many people go through this process naturally to some extent as they learn and grow. However, there are layers that are so deep that we are incapable of seeing them ourselves.

These are our sacred cows.

Sacred cows are best worked on with others who are doing the same work. It is easier to see the mote in another's eye than in your own. It is not so easy to put them into question once identified.

As our sacred cows are rooted out, we are able to see the world with fewer and fewer filters. We no longer have the automatic faith in our leaders that would blind us to the possibility that the "terrorist" attacks that have made headlines in the Western countries are the work of our own governments or their allies. We no longer believe that "our leaders would never do such a thing" because the facts tell us otherwise. Innocents are slaughtered time and again to achieve the agenda of the people in power.

We are also able to read the geological and archaeological record and see that evolution and geological development do not develop in a linear, peaceful way. There are many moments of discontinuity, of quantum jumps when chaos and disorder reign, moments of transition when the earth and its societies are thrown into upheaval.

The study of complex systems and chaos theory shows us that such developments are completely natural and should be expected, and that periods of turbulence can be the sign that such a phase transition is on its way.

For us, higher consciousness is the ability to see these things, the ability to discern the invisible hand behind them, that is, the play between creation and entropy, and the existence of a real entropic force in our world. Gurdjieff and Mouravieff call this force the General Law, a force that works to keep us in our place, anchored to our sacred cows.

Many people write to us and wonder what it is they should do in the face of the horrors of our world. We think that the first step is to begin the process of overcoming our own mechanical natures and to learn to see the world without our filters. If we cannot see the world clearly, how can we expect to act in a way that will not add more chaos? We add chaos every time we try to "save" someone or impose our ideas on someone who hasn't asked. In such cases, we are violating the free will of the person we are attempting to influence. They have the right to their ideas. We have no business imposing our own. Coming to an understanding of this question can be a long and painful process as the people we wish to "save" may be very close such as family members or friends. The reality of the General Law is so obvious and clear once it is identified that we can forget how much effort it took to see it for ourselves. It will not be patently obvious to others when we try and point it out. Each person must learn to see it for themselves.

Needless to say, many people react strongly against the idea that we can learn to see the world objectively. They believe that we each have our own truth, and that truth is what we make it. This idea is a form of the "you create your own reality" meme. It has sunk deep roots in Western countries where the idea of the rights of the individual have been promoted so strongly to the detriment of the idea of communal rights. Unfortunately, communal rights have also been used to limit the freedoms of individuals, but such a dialectic is normal in a world where our individualities are shaped by consumer culture. How can mechanical beings such as we are have any real sense of what true freedom might be? Once more, our filters and sacred cows come into play.

The process we are describing is a long one. Our work on Signs of the Times is in a certain sense the documentation of our attempts to come to grips with our own sacred cows. Our comments change as we gather more data and as the work we do to shed our own filters deepens. In the end, it is the direction we are heading that is important. We are each at different places on the road heading for an elusive goal known as the truth.

I have a recurring dream. I am on an airplane, sitting in a window seat, gazing contentedly out the window at the tops of puffy clouds and microscopic towns far below, gabbing amiably with the passenger next to me. Soon it becomes apparent that we disagree about our scheduled destination. He insists it's L.A.; I say New York.

As I begin to stir in my seat to get up to ask a flight attendant to settle our dispute, we notice the busy stewardesses are conducting an odd exercise. With polite smiles, they are choosing random passengers one by one, and escorting them to the emergency escape hatch. First a boy clutching his skateboard, then a middle-aged woman in a black business suit, then a soccer mom grasping the small hand of her toddler, all willingly step out into thin air as their guides bid them a cordial farewell.

Incredulous, I lurch to the far window and witness a Mary Poppins-like trail of passengers plummeting toward the ground. Panicked, I turn back to my seatmate, and he returns my look of horror with an empty-headed, nothing-is-wrong smile. Apoplectic, I race feverishly toward the cockpit, wrench open the cabin door, and discover there is no one inside. The pilots' seats are empty.

Astonished, I whirl around and find myself face-to-face with a mannequin stewardess. "Don't you just love autopilot?" she mutters dreamily. "You know, you just have to have faith. Here, let me show you the door to your future."

•••

How much longer, I wonder constantly, will seemingly sensible and honest people continue to put up with this perverted political passion play now besieging the world that is so obviously detrimental to the needs of average people, even willfully destructive of those needs?

The dire predictions of so-called conspiracy theorists are all coming true: senseless wars are being created with transparent lies for the profits of a select few; the populace is infected with obvious poisons from both the medical profession and the food industry who because of recently passed laws are immune from legal action by the victims of these cruel concoctions; and our money is being steadily stolen by inbred elitist bankers who use accounting sleight-of-hand to funnel currency to that same small segment of the population who all seem to be immune from laws that guarantee poverty for the rest of us.

Maybe worst of all is the fantasy world created by our commercial mass media, which prohibit any discussion of human values relative to honest government and exacerbate our problems with so-called entertainment dominated by nihilistic and pornographically self-destructive scripts.

What kind of spineless, braindead cretins would tolerate such a blatant conspiracy?

Well, the American people, to name one group, but also most of the people on the planet, who every day choose to trade their hard-won emotional securities and family ties for mindless mechanized titillation, and then cower in their powerlessness because they are all so dependent on a technological system that encourages addiction to mindless consumerism.

Most of us are hypnotized by fashionable capitalistic shills who castigate natural self-reliance as antisocial selfishness. We have all been victimized by the alluring softness of high-tech trinkets that sever our contact with the life-giving land and more and more solidify our isolation while causing us to forsake our healthy dependence on those we are inclined to love.

How come so few people realize that nobody is free, that everybody is owned by banks? Nobody owns their homes, their cars; even their educations and careers are in significant hock to the banks. You regard your marriage, for those of you who still have one of those, as inauthentic without the sanction of the state. Even your children are not your property; they must be given poisonous vaccinations at birth or public health fascists will take them from you and claim you are unfit parents. This is law in a world made mad and turned upside down.

Isn't it strange so few Americans have objected to the new, out-front use of torture on people who have never even been tried in a court of law - never mind convicted - especially when underground reports of those taken prisoner and persecuted at Guantanamo reveal them not as terrorists but as hapless victims abducted to lend apparent authenticity to a minor detail of Washington's contrived terror fantasies?

Why has nobody figured out that our government is not protecting us from terrorists? Our government creates terrorists so we will in sheer insecure panic support the criminal cabal that is ravaging the world with senseless mass murder, enabling it to keep us in a stirred-up state of dependent fear because that allows it to better control and regiment us into prescripted cadres of servile dupes. This is not freedom, this is slavery - terrorized, manipulated slavery to the banks - and it is what we face with increasing insecurity every single day.

Why do we put up with it? Why don't we see through the ruse? Especially since our lives depend on seeing through it.

•••

Right after the recent bombings in London, I was so impressed by the size of the web chorus immediately pointing out that the deed was a deception, and that four innocent Islamic chaps from Leeds had apparently been set up to take the fall as the culprits for this latest public atrocity from the power elite. These reports dutifully noted that all the suspicious characters, from Rudy Giuliani to Benjamin Netanyahu, were conveniently in place to spin the traditional public myth, just like after 9/11.

I thought, each time the The Big Lie becomes a little bit clearer, the human future gets a little bit brighter.

But the power of big media is monstrous, and just as with 9/11 and the Iraq war, what is on the lips of people in the street is far different from what is on the minds of intelligent commentators in cyberspace.

First it was my neighbor. "Those freaking ragheads. We oughtta just go over there and bomb them all to bits." Taken aback, I retorted, "We've already been doing that for years." But he would not be placated, or reasoned with. "Nuke 'em. Nuke 'em all," he barked, and stormed off.

Things were no better with my family. "Why do THOSE PEOPLE keep doing these things to us?" several wondered, interrupting their trains of thought from the preparation of a family feast, with no recognition of the continuing American atrocities all over the world. "Oh? Which people are that?" I countered casually, but they didn't answer.

Then came the TV blasts of Muslim-this and Arab-that, the prediction by Bush-shill Joseph Farah that al-Qaeda would strike soon in the U.S.

But lost amid all the mawkish mourning of the London tragedy was the excellent story about what al-Qaeda truly was - a CIA database that the war machine's spin doctors had long ago morphed into the reincarnation of Dracula's vampires - that was posted on the Conspiracy Planet website which I read at <http://100777.com/node/1343> (another cool website) that had been sent to me by some friendly Dalits in India (love those Dalits, but the rest of the Indians seem as ugly as Americans and Israelis put together).

And speaking of great webfriends, Lilia Firefly, well-known West Coast tawo seed carrier (Google it), sent me a very telling story that aptly signified the danger of careening from atrocity to atrocity without stopping to think about the context of all these serial depredations. The Downing Street Memos. Remember them? Two weeks down the line and they've already been sucked into the memory hole.

The Downing Street Memos, dear American friends, are the documents which prove Bush and Blair had determined to go to war against Iraq and fixed their public pronouncements - tailored their phony evidence - around this murderous policy. The Downing Street Memos are what should have brought every honest American into the streets as a lynch mob demanding the immediate and public hanging of George W. Bush and hundreds of other U.S. government officials.

But this also should have happened after 9/11 when Bush and Daschle agreed to limit the scope of the investigation so as not to jeopardize "national security." By now you can see by all these non-responses how many honest Americans really exist - namely, not nearly enough.

The Downing Street Memos are what proves that George W. Bush and his Gang of Ghouls (prominently featuring Judith Miller and The New York Times in the starring role of perverted propagandists) have thrown away 9,000 American lives and 128,000 Iraqi civilian lives for what were provably premeditated lies.

The Downing Street Memos verify beyond any doubt what Americans have become - irredeemable Zionist Nazi thugs, who will kill anyone for any reason, or no reason at all.

The main reason for the London bombings was to disappear the Downing Street Memo story from the world's headlines, and it worked perfectly. The satanic chorus of Fox News, CNN, et al chimed in with strategic bits of planted information to brook no doubt that Islamic terrorists were behind the London atrocities, even though the alleged perps - now conveniently dead - previously exhibited not a sniff of terrorist tendencies.

Even an old Mossad chief got in on the act, advocating for World War Three. And several Israeli officials hammered their propaganda point home with remarks like "now you know how we feel."

Yes, we do, I thought. We are being lied to constantly about what is actually happening, and you are blowing us up to prove your point. The mass media are in your pocket and ordinary people are so consumed by their own survival requirements that they can't possibly perceive the twists and turns of all the deceptions, and consequently just accept the pap they hear on their local media outlets, because they don't have the time and energy to pursue the accurate details themselves. Which is just the way they want it, they being the people who control us, conduct fraudulent elections, and bomb whomever they please in pursuit of profit.

Nobody I know in cyberspace believes the official story. What appears to have happened is that four innocent patsies were recruited to participate in a terror drill, then deceptively given live bombs that took their lives, and the lives of 50-some others. Once again, the anticipated aftermath was meticulously scripted to defame Muslims.

The ensuing spin goes one better than the trick of 9/11, in which the FBI instantaneously named 19 Arabs as the culprits, then had to suffer the indignity of having eight of the names turn up alive in various places, all claiming that they didn't do the deed. Of course, the FBI wasn't embarrassed enough to change their list of 9/11 perps, and the American public was simply too stupid to ask why not.

This time around, they figured out a way to kill them all, then planted their papers near the scene. So while their families know these men to be innocent, at least the FBI will have no surprise patsies turning up alive this time.

If this caper could be anything other than a Zionist false flag advertisement for its continuing genocide against the worldwide threat known as the Amalek (a.k.a, non-Jews who don't support Israel), I would like to know what that is.

•••

I receive about 500 e-mails each day, and most frequent question I get is - for sure - what can we do?

For a long time now I've been fielding questions about what to do and have only had the clumsy answer, "Stand securely in your own truth and be an example to others."

But lately I've realized that the world has never been in touch with a reality that we desperately need to achieve if we are to survive.

The principal revelation of this reality is that religions control our minds with magical, fictional lies, and if we choose to believe them, we become susceptible to authoritarian propaganda that also is all lies.

You can't prove that Moses, Krishna, Buddha, or Jesus ever walked on this planet, and if you believe in the statements attributed to them, you cannot accurately perceive what is happening to you as the bars on this prison planet are securely constructed around your lives.

As long as we continue to believe that we are to bow down to and not criticize these religious stereotypes, we can't adequately challenge the same kind of authoritarianism we get from our corrupt leaders, and as a consequence, the "authorities" have carte blanche to exploit and obliterate us at their whim. And we, in our gratitude for the gifts we have been given, are constrained from challenging them with simple logic.

How many times in your life have you heard your preacher, your priest, or your rabbi declare with unctuous certainty, support your leaders, or, my country right or wrong. It all stems from the Biblical injunction, "Render unto Caesar ...."

This is not spirituality. This is mind-control. To go against this portentous command, you risk eternal damnation, the loss of your soul, and whatever other dire consequences you may, from your many formative years of conditioning in these matters, contemplate.

We need to reach a new reality we have never had, and first among the tasks in accomplishing that is doing away with magic myths that prevent us from seeing what's really going on.

Because of their ingrained preconditioning, this solution offends a majority of the world's population, who since their childhoods have been indoctrinated in one religious system or another, and consequently base their perceptions of the world and its chaotic human society on these magical stories and senseless myths that in a very real way limit their ability to react sensibly to insane pronouncements, like "they hate our freedoms" or "Saddam has weapons of mass destruction," two deliberate, stupid, and facile lies that have been believed by a majority of the American people.

These are lies we tell our children, and lies we tell ourselves.

The only legitimate excuse for religious ritual is to calm the fears of children who wonder where their loved ones have gone when their lives have expired. The unexpected consequence of this seemingly innocent practice is that these children never grow up. Instead, they transfer the feelings of both security and fear they felt toward their parents to an imaginary superbeing whom they regard as an imaginary parent for the rest of their lives.

As this is the single most important cultural ritual humans ever undergo, its power and importance was long ago recognized and by those with the psychological need to dominate others, and was cloaked by a profession of altruism that thrived on a certain power to control the lives of others with magical myths that masked the exploitation of innocents by self-labeled aristocrats. The same process continues today.

The relationship between holy men allegedly possessing secrets of the afterlife and those who cherish such fantasies because they alleviate the everpresent but suppressed fear of death is the dark side of human consciousness, and a corrupt cultural relationship that has lasted for more than five thousand years. So in a sense, the priestly process can be regarded as satisfying an obvious and universal emotional need.

But it is also a recipe for extinction, since holy warriors will always willingly kill for a goal that no one else can see, except the malicious minds of power-mad priests. And mullahs. And rabbis. It has been proven too many times that when the enemy is completely annihilated, then we begin killing each other, because we have learned no other way to live.

Our allegiance may not be to one race, creed, or color. If it is, within the rules of the free market, we will eventually claim supernatural superiority for ourselves and begin the holy task of eliminating all the infidels. Clearly written in the Talmud and the Old Testament, it is really the beginning of the task of eliminating ourselves, subliminal marching orders to our own self-destruction.

This is what will finish us. It's time to realize this very small-minded syndrome has been going on for much longer than two thousand years, and it's a stupid illusion, cultivated for profit by the very perps who besiege us now with all their fake terror alerts, false flag mass murders, and supercilious, sanctimonious soliloquies saying they are acting in the name of God.

The choices are two: get real, and let people venerate the awesome miracle of life in any way they wish, or perish, by the sword or by the pox. Time grows short.

•••

Here's another recurring nightmare, one that you, dear reader, have experienced all too frequently in recent years. In it, an angelic being, majestically robed in sacred raiments, benevolently beams down at you and says, in the most soothing voice imaginable, "My God is better than yours ...."

John Kaminski is an Internet columnist whose essays are seen on hundreds of websites around the world. They have been collected into two anthologies, titled "America's Autopsy Report" and "The Perfect Enemy." These are for sale on his website, http://www.johnkaminski.com/ Also for sale is "The Day America Died: Why You Shouldn't Believe the Official Story of What Happened on September 11, 2001," written for those who still believe the government's false story of that tragic day.

JERUSALEM, July 18 (Reuters) - One of the suspected bombers in the London attacks visited Israel for one day in 2003, an Israeli official said on Monday, bolstering a news report the British-born Muslim helped plan a Tel Aviv suicide bombing.

The government official said Mohammad Sidique Khan, who London police believe blew himself up on an underground train this month, arrived in Israel on Feb. 19, 2003, and left the next day.

The official declined to speculate on reasons for the visit.

Israeli daily Maariv said on Sunday that Khan was suspected of helping plan a pro-Palestinian suicide bombing by two fellow Britons of Pakistani descent on April 30, 2003. Three Israelis were killed in the attack on Mike's Place bar in Tel Aviv.

But Israeli security sources played down the report, which cited no evidence. "This is not a concrete finding," a source said on Sunday.

British police named Khan as a member of an al Qaeda-style cell that killed 55 people in the July 7 bombings in London.

Pakistani immigration officials told Reuters on Monday that Khan, 31, and two other cell members visited Karachi last year.

One of the suspects, Shehzad Tanweer, visited madrasahs, or Muslim religious schools, in Pakistan, the sources said.

Israeli officials are under orders from Prime Minister Ariel Sharon not to link the London attacks and Palestinian militants.

After al Qaeda's Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, Sharon was quick to draw parallels to Israel's own struggle against Islamic militants who have spearheaded a Palestinian uprising since 2000.

Hamas, an Islamic movement sworn to Israel's destruction, issued a joint claim of responsibility for Mike's Place bar along with al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, an armed wing of the dominant Palestinian political faction Fatah.

Asaf Hanif, a Briton of Pakistani descent, blew himself up at the bar, but his comrade Omar Sharif fled after apparently failing to detonate his bomb. Sharif's body was found in the sea a week later. Investigators concluded he had drowned.

Palestinian officials and militants say al Qaeda has no significant presence in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Some Israeli analysts agree, noting doctrinal differences between Osama bin Laden's network, which operates globally and targets moderate Muslims as well as non-Muslims, and Palestinian militants, who have recently limited their attacks to Jews in Israel and Israeli-occupied territories. (Additional reporting by Faisal Aziz in Karachi)

The controversy continues over an Associated Press story detailing the remarks of a "senior Israeli official" who claimed that Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in London for an economic conference, was warned by Scotland Yard "minutes" in advance of the terrorist bombings. According to the original story, Netanyahu's prior knowledge was the cause of his not showing up at the conference, which took place at a hotel near the Liverpool Underground station. A subsequent AP report contained the Israeli's government's denial of a prior warning, and claimed that Netanyahu received a warning after the blasts.

Although the first AP story was never retracted, that didn't prevent Israel's American amen corner from claiming that it had been withdrawn, nor did it stop Stratfor.com from coming out with an analysis claiming that Israel knew "days" in advance, and that it wasn't Scotland Yard that informed Netanyahu. Former intelligence analyst Tommy Preston, of Preston Global, concurred.

My own column drawing on these sources drew fire, not only from the usual suspects, but also from dailykos.com, the Democratic party website spawned by the Dean campaign. "Antiwar.com is not a legitimate source," declared one poster.

This from a website that headlined "Did BushCo Tip Off London Bombers?"!

An author who goes by the name "DHinMI" manufactured a quote, purportedly from me, that was nothing more than a crude fabrication: it had quote marks around it, as if I had written it, when in reality I had written no such thing. DhinMI's point: that to even suggest that Netanyahu had advance notice of the London bombings is so obviously an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theory" that no discussion is required, regardless of what the Associated Press reports.

The Kossacks, as they call themselves, are trying to clean their act up so that they can be more closely associated with the Democratic party apparatus. However, why limit themselves to condemning my column: why not condemn AP as an "illegitimate source" for publishing the news of Netanyahu's foreknowledge to begin with? And while they're at it, they need to add a few more media source to the list, including some of the Israeli media. Israel Insider cites Mossad chief Meir Dagan, in an interview with the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag:

"The Mossad office in London received advance notice about the attacks, but only six minutes before the first blast, the paper reports, confirming an earlier AP report. As a result, it was impossible to take any action to prevent the blasts."

Here is the Bild am Sonntag story in German, and a Google translation.

Is this just empty boasting on the part of the Mossad chief, or is there some truth to the initial AP report? Is Meir Dagan spreading anti-Semitic conspiracy theories?

We report. You decide.

I might add that some of the DailyKos folks are shocked – shocked! – that Antiwar.com opposed the Kosovo war. We, in turn, are shocked at the hypocrisy of those who support a war of aggression against a country, Yugoslavia, that had never attacked us, and that was never sanctioned by the United Nations. They only oppose wars started by Republicans: we at Antiwar.com, on the other hand, oppose all wars of aggression, regardless of the partisan affiliation of those in power at the time.

BOMBER Jermaine Lindsay bought innocent designer perfumes and aftershaves as a deadly mix for the London gang's home-made devices, police fear.

Just days before the 7/7 explosions killed at least 55 people, the 19-year-old Jamaican fanatic spent £900 at three shops on dozens of bottles of scent.

The names - Jean Paul Gaultier, Fahrenheit, Emporio Armani and Boss - are the epitome of "decadent" Western luxury.

But in the hands of Lindsay the alcohol-based perfumes could have been used to fuel bombs with a deadly napalm-style effect, causing hideous burns.

The Gaultier fragrances were in metal containers which would have splintered into lethal shrapnel in an explosion. Lindsay bought 10.

Terror expert Dr Andrew Silke, of the University of East London, said: "The active ingredient in any perfume is alcohol which can be used in creating devices.

"The effect would be more incendiary, like napalm, rather than highly explosive. It would create more more fire and therefore more burn injuries."

On July 4 Lindsay visited branches of the Fragrance Shop in his home town of Aylesbury, Bucks, and Milton Keynes and Woolworth's in Aylesbury, spending about £300 in each store.

The following day he returned to the Fragrance Shop in Aylesbury searching for a bottle of Boss In Motion perfume he had been unable to buy at Milton Keynes.

Detectives are also investigating whether Lindsay also bought peroxide. Peroxide is an ingredient in Acetone Peroxide - also known as TATP or "Mother of Satan" - which was used in the London attacks.

Lindsay's spending patterns had already aroused the suspicion of his bank who brought in private detectives.

Noel Hogan, of investigators Hogan and Co International, said last night: "We were aware of this man's movements in the immediate run-up to the London bombing.

"As soon as we became aware of his involvement we contacted the Anti-Terrorist Branch. We have passed them our full records. I can say no more."

Yesterday staff at the Fragrance Shop in Aylesbury recalled Lindsay's spree. One said: "He came in here over two days and spent about £330. He was calm and polite. But it's strange to buy so much perfume at once and my manager was suspicious.

"The next day he spent £300 on more scents at our shop in Milton Keynes.

"While there, he got really agitated because he wanted a perfume called Boss In Motion Green which comes in a little hard sphere. He was telling them 'I must have one - where can I get one?' Next day he bought it from us."

"Apparently he went back to the shop in Milton Keynes all flustered saying, 'Have you seen a red bag I had?' They didn't have it and I don't know if he ever found it again. But he was really worried."

It is believed Lindsay tried to buy hundreds of pounds worth of Jean Paul Gaultier perfume at Aylesbury a week earlier. A man matching his description left the shop empty-handed when his cheque and bank card did not tally.

Lindsay worked under a false identity as a fitter for Haddenham Carpets in Aylesbury until around May 2005. He called himself Gemal Lindsay, a corruption of his real name and Islamic name Abdullah Shaheed Jamal.

Around the time he left the job he stopped making weekly phone calls to his father Nigel in Jamaica.

Two months later he joined Mohammed Sidique Khan, 30, of Dewsbury, Shehzad Tanweer, 22, of Leeds, and Hasib Hussain, 18, also of Leeds, on their killer attacks on three Tubes and a bus in London.

Nigel, 45, who split from Lindsay's mother Mary when the boy was five months old, said: "Jermaine sounded like he was happy with his life and his religion.

"He gave no sign that he was up to anything bad. I never thought my boy would do this kind of thing in a million years."

Lindsay's mother Mary, 39, who lives in Boston, Massachusetts, said: "I haven't stopped crying for all the people who died."

Mary hoped Islam's strict codes on alcohol and sex would keep her son out of trouble. She was pleased when he married 21-year-old Samantha Lewthwaite, also a recent convert to Islam.

Pregnant Samantha - mother of Lindsay's year-old son - said at the weekend: "I never imagined he was involved in such horrific activities. My thoughts are with families of the victims."

The strain on Lindsay's family became apparent yesterday when his stepsister collapsed in the street. Dana Reid was taken to hospital after being found near her home in Huddersfield, West Yorks.

Before her dramatic collapse, pregnant Dana recalled the moment she learned Lindsay was a mass killer.

She received a phone call from Mary last Friday. Dana said: "Her voice started to quiver and she said 'Jermaine's dead'. I screamed and she added 'He wasn't a victim. He was one of the bombers'."

Lindsay's step-grandmother, Stella McLeod, said: "It's Satan. It's the devil. God wouldn't allow that to happen."

Friends said Lindsay's transformation from normal boy to killer came after a summer holiday to Afghanistan.

Samantha Rana-Liburd said: "He was a really popular lad but all that changed. He had converted to Islam and his character was totally different."

Her boyfriend Kyle Walter, 19, added: "It was like he was brainwashed."

Another former friend, who did not want to be named, said: "Jermaine went to the extreme. He became an evil bastard to a lot of people he had grown up with."

SIX people were arrested by police probing the massacre last night. They were held in a guesthouse in the Beeston area of Leeds.

LONDON - Britain's interior minister moved a step closer to passing tough new anti-terrorism laws by December after he won "broad support" from the opposition parties in the wake of the London bombings.

The news came as the death toll from the country's worst terror attack rose by one to 56, and as a report linked Britain's support of the Iraq war to the July 7 atrocity, turning up the heat on Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Home Secretary Charles Clarke said he and his counterparts in the main opposition Conservative and smaller Liberal Democrat parties agreed in principle to co-operate on the draft legislation following hour-long talks.

"We believe that is the right way to go and we believe that it will enable us to address the threat we face with a unity and determination which is critical," Clarke, flanked by David Davis of the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats' Mark Oaten, told reporters.

Comment: This all sounds eerily familiar, doesn't it?

The bill is expected to be put before lawmakers in October when parliament reopens after its summer recess and become law by December.

The interior minister wrote to opposition parties Friday outlining plans for the bill that would outlaw the indirect incitement of terrorism, for example preachers who praise suicide bombers or describe them as martyrs.

Tougher new laws -- which initially sparked outrage from the opposition when they were first aired earlier this year -- seem likely to win widespread support among a public still reeling from the twin shock of the suicide bombings coupled with the discovery the attackers were home grown.

Asked how confident he was that the bill would survive parliamentary scrutiny, Clarke said: "Very confident. The broad support for where we are is very strong."

He also said that the government was ready to consider even tighter legislation if the security services deem such a move desirable, but he noted that police for the time being were concentrating on unraveling the London bombings. [...]

"I'm astonished that Chatham House is now saying that we should not have stood shoulder to shoulder with our long-standing allies in the United States," Straw said on arrival at a meeting of EU foreign ministers in Brussels.

Chatham House also heavily criticised the British government's anti-terrorism strategy, accusing it of working shoulder-to-shoulder with the United States as a back seat passenger rather than an equal decision maker.

To this charge, Blair's official spokesman said both London and Washington simply had the same priorities in the fight against terrorism.

"What it means is that we work with allies," he added.

Comment: Right. That must be why when Bush says, "Jump!" Blair asks, "How high?" Blair is hardly Bush's equal. Blair might delude himself into believing he has a chip in the big game, but in Bush's eyes, he is the master and Blair is the puppet.

Meanwhile, the massive police investigation into the blasts on three London Underground trains and a bus rumbled on.

The Times reported that two of the suspected bombers, Shehzad Tanweer and Mohammad Sidique Khan, may have met the chief plotter of the London attacks after arriving in the Pakistani port city of Karachi last November for a visit.

It carried a grainy photograph of the pair while they arrived in Karachi.

The Pakistani authorities told The Times they know the identity of the British-born mastermind whom the British authorities are trying to track down. "We believe this is where they could have met their mentor," a Pakistani security source was quoted as saying.

"They did not appear to go where they told their families they were heading, and they have no obvious connection to Karachi, which was the center of previous Al-Qaeda operations," the source was quoted as saying.

British officials say the July 7 attacks bore the hallmarks of
Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network.

Keen to forge a consensus on confronting Islamic extremism, Blair will meet leaders of Britain's 1.6 million strong Muslim community Tuesday, his spokesman said.

LONDON - Security services have barred more than 200 foreign scientists from studying at British universities over the past four years, amid fears they could present a terrorist threat, a newspaper reported.

The Guardian newspaper said the scientists were among more than 2,000 vetted after applying to universities to do postgraduate or post-doctoral research in fields such as chemistry, microbiology and biotechnology.

The figures were released to the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act as police continue to search for those linked to the London terror bombings on July 7.

The British authorities started taking greater security precautions in response to the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the United States.

Universities have long been seen as attractive to potential terrorists because of the high level of scientific training on offer, the Guardian said.

Institutions can refer potentially suspect applicants for security clearance via the Foreign and Commonwealth Office's voluntary vetting scheme, which was set up in 1994 to prevent foreign scientists learning skills on British soil that could be used to develop weapons of mass destruction.

Under the scheme, universities can request security checks on scientists from 10 countries, including Pakistan, Syria, India and Egypt, who apply to study any of 21 scientific disciplines.

The documents, obtained before this month's bombings, reveal that 2,282 scientists were referred for vetting from 2001 until May this year. Of those, security officials recommended that 238 be rejected admission to their chosen university, the Guardian said.

In the year until May, eight foreign scientists had their applications rejected.

The scheme was being reviewed by the Cabinet Office when the bombers hit London. Many academics believe it is flawed and several prominent universities refuse to participate.

An Israeli military court sentenced a soldier charged of killing a Palestinian resident in Rafah, in the south of the Gaza Strip, to disciplinary measures but did not delay his promotion.

Officer Adam Zousman ordered soldiers under his command to conduct a military march after their group was promoted to a brigade. The soldiers marched along the Rafah borders and were allowed to fire "warning shots", towards the Palestinian homes in the area.

The soldiers marched near Rafah and Khan Younis and continued firing their live ammunition until they reached their final destination in the Moragh settlement.

One Palestinian child, aged 15 years, was shot dead by military fire during their march.

The army investigated the incident and claimed that there was no connection between the two incidents. Two weeks ago, officer Zousman was charged by the military prosecution for the illegal usage of arms, but it also recommended that his promotion should not be delayed.

DENVER, Colorado (AP) -- A Colorado congressman told a radio show host that the U.S. could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim fundamentalist terrorists attacked the country with nuclear weapons.

Rep. Tom Tancredo made his remarks Friday on WFLA-AM in Orlando, Florida. His spokesman stressed he was only speaking hypothetically.

Talk show host Pat Campbell asked the Littleton Republican how the country should respond if terrorists struck several U.S. cities with nuclear weapons.

"Well, what if you said something like -- if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites," Tancredo answered.

"You're talking about bombing Mecca," Campbell said.

"Yeah," Tancredo responded.

The congressman later said he was "just throwing out some ideas" and that an "ultimate threat" might have to be met with an "ultimate response."

Spokesman Will Adams said Sunday the four-term congressman doesn't support threatening holy Islamic sites but that Tancredo was grappling with the hypothetical situation of a terrorist strike deadlier than the September 11, 2001, attacks.

"We have an enemy with no uniform, no state, who looks like you and me and only emerges right before an attack. How do we go after someone like that?" Adams said.

"What is near and dear to them? They're willing to sacrifice everything in this world for the next one. What is the pressure point that would deter them from their murderous impulses?" he said.

Tancredo is known in the House for his tough stand on immigration.

Mohammad Noorzai, coordinator of the Colorado Muslim Council and a native of Afghanistan, said Tancredo's remarks were radical and unrepresentative but that people in Tancredo's position need to watch their words when it comes to sacred religious sites and texts.

WARSAW, July 18 (Xinhuanet) -- Poland supports Ukraine's efforts to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the European Union (EU), Deputy Foreign Minister Andrzej Zalucki said Monday.

Zalucki made the remarks at the second session of the Polish-Ukrainian parliamentary assembly.

Discussion within the EU on a new round of enlargement was deeply affected after the bloc was plunged into crisis by France and the Netherlands' rejection of the EU constitution treaty, he said, adding that the enlargement process should not come to a standstill.

Ukraine's status of market economy should be recognized in a foreseeable future and Poland supports the country's bid to join the World Trade Organization, Zalucki said.

The Polish-Ukrainian parliamentary assembly, in operation since2003, is comprised of 40 parliament members from the two countries.

Canadian businessman Maurice Strong has lost his job as the United Nations top envoy to North Korea over his connection to the oil-for-food scandal, said the UN.

A UN spokesperson said Monday that the 76-year-old's contract expired last week and will not be renewed.

He had stepped down from his post in April while investigators looked into his ties with a South Korean businessman accused in the scandal.

Tongsun Park is accused of accepting millions of dollars from the Iraqi government while lobbying illegally for oil-for-food contracts.

Park invested money in a Calgary oil company run by Strong's son, Frederick.

Strong has denied any involvement in the scandal.

Strong was also criticized for giving his stepdaughter Kristina Mayo a job at the UN. She worked as Strong's assistant for two years.